Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

UK Regulation 261 (assimilated air passenger rights)

NationalGBRead off primary law

United Kingdom

Rule id
air.uk261
Version
1.0.0
In force from
January 1, 2021
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
United Kingdom

In plain language

What this regime says.

When the UK left the EU it kept Regulation 261/2004 in domestic law and swapped the euro figures for sterling: GBP 220, GBP 350 and GBP 520 depending on distance, for a cancellation, an overbooking, or an arrival three hours or more late. The rules are otherwise the same as the EU ones, but the enforcement is different — and in one respect weaker.

Who is covered

Anyone departing from a UK airport, on any airline in the world. And anyone arriving at a UK airport from abroad, but only where the operating airline holds a UK or EU/EEA licence — an American, Gulf or Asian carrier flying into Heathrow is outside the regime. Many UK–EU flights are covered by both this and the EU Regulation, in which case you must choose one.

What you get

GBP 220 up to 1,500 km, GBP 350 for 1,500–3,500 km, GBP 520 over 3,500 km — halved to GBP 110, GBP 175 or GBP 260 where a replacement got you there almost on time, which is why the CAA publishes GBP 260 for long-haul arrivals three to four hours late. Separately, and whatever the cause: a refund or re-routing at your choice, meals, a hotel where you are stranded overnight, and two free communications. A downgrade repays 30%, 50% or 75% of the ticket price.

Where claims go wrong

  • Expecting the CAA to make the airline pay. It cannot. Only a CAA-approved ADR scheme, or a court, can bind the airline.
  • Applying to the wrong ADR scheme. Which one covers your airline depends on the airline: British Airways, BA CityFlyer, Cathay Pacific, Norse Atlantic and SAS use CEDR; easyJet, Ryanair, Wizz Air, Virgin Atlantic, TUI, Air France, KLM and many others use AviationADR; the Lufthansa Group airlines use a recognised German scheme.
  • Claiming under both UK261 and EU261 for the same flight. They overlap on UK–EU routes and you must elect one.
  • Missing that Scotland has a five-year prescription rather than six years, and that Scots prescription extinguishes the obligation rather than merely barring the claim.
  • Measuring the delay at departure rather than at the final destination, or accepting an on-blocks arrival time rather than the door-open time.
  • Taking a voucher. Article 7(3) entitles you to cash unless you sign for a voucher.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 as retained in UK lawRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, as it forms part of assimilated law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by SI 2019/278URL verified 2026-08-05
  2. The Air Passenger Rights and Air Travel Organisers' Licensing (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/278)The Air Passenger Rights and Air Travel Organisers' Licensing (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019URL verified 2026-08-05
  3. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 5Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, as it forms part of assimilated law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by SI 2019/278URL verified 2026-08-05Art. 5
  4. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 7Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, as it forms part of assimilated law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by SI 2019/278URL verified 2026-08-05Art. 7
  5. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 8Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, as it forms part of assimilated law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by SI 2019/278URL verified 2026-08-05Art. 8
  6. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 9Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, as it forms part of assimilated law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by SI 2019/278URL verified 2026-08-05Art. 9
  7. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 10Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, as it forms part of assimilated law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by SI 2019/278URL verified 2026-08-05Art. 10
  8. Limitation Act 1980, s. 9Limitation Act 1980, s. 9 (England and Wales)URL verified 2026-08-05
  9. Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, s. 6Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, s. 6 and Sch. 1URL verified 2026-08-05
  10. Sturgeon and Others, Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2009, ECLI:EU:C:2009:716URL verified 2026-08-05
  11. Germanwings GmbH v Ronny Henning, C-452/13Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2141
  12. Air France SA v Heinz-Gerke Folkerts and Luz-Tereza Folkerts, C-11/11Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:106
  13. Bossen and Others v Brussels Airlines SA/NV, C-559/16Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 September 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:644
  14. Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia, C-549/07Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2008, ECLI:EU:C:2008:771

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Limitation period — England and WalesFatal if missedVaries by jurisdictionEngland and Wales: 6 years. Limitation Act 1980 s. 9 (action to recover a sum recoverable by virtue of an enactment), six years from accrual. Put beyond doubt by SI 2023/1370, which inserted Art. 3(9) into the assimilated Regulation: "For limitation purposes a claim under this Regulation will be determined in accordance with section 9 of the Limitation Act 1980." Consistent with Dawson v Thomson Airways [2014] EWCA Civ 845. This is the longest period available in the United Kingdom and is the date we treat as decisive.Limitation Act 1980, s. 9Limitation period
  • Limitation period — ScotlandVaries by jurisdictionScotland: 5 years. Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, s. 6 and Schedule 1 — the five-year short negative prescription. Note that Scots negative prescription EXTINGUISHES the obligation rather than merely barring the remedy. Shown because it applies if you sue in this jurisdiction rather than in England and Wales.Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, s. 6Limitation period
  • Limitation period — Northern IrelandVaries by jurisdictionNorthern Ireland: 6 years. Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989, art. 4 — six years for an action on a simple contract or to recover a sum recoverable by virtue of an enactment. Shown because it applies if you sue in this jurisdiction rather than in England and Wales.Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989, art. 4Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • You could have abandoned the journey and demanded a refundAt five hours’ delay you may abandon the journey and take a full refund of the unused portion within seven days, plus a flight back to your first point of departure where the journey no longer serves any purpose. That stands alongside the compensation, not instead of it.Art. 8
  • Meals and refreshmentsMeals and refreshments in a reasonable relation to the waiting time, free of charge. If the airline gave you nothing, keep the receipts and claim what you spent.Art. 9
  • Two free communicationsTwo telephone calls, telex or fax messages, or emails, free of charge. Rarely offered and rarely worth much, but it is an entitlement and a refusal is a regulatory breach worth recording.Art. 9
  • Payment in cash, not vouchersArticle 7(3) requires payment in cash, by bank transfer, bank order or cheque — vouchers only with your signed agreement. A voucher offered by email is not payment, and you are not obliged to take it.Art. 7
  • A written statement of your rightsArticle 14 requires the airline to hand affected passengers a written notice of the rules on compensation and assistance and to display one at check-in. Failure to do so is worth reporting to the CAA.Art. 14

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"Extraordinary circumstances"

high likelihood

The airline asserts extraordinary circumstances without identifying them or evidencing them.

What answers it

Article 5(3) exonerates the carrier only "if it can prove" the extraordinary circumstance. The burden lies on the airline, not on you. You do not have to establish why your flight was disrupted in order to be paid. Even where an extraordinary circumstance is made out, the carrier is only excused if it also proves the disruption could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken — which includes deploying reserve aircraft or crew, and re-routing the passenger on another airline where that was open to it. Asserting the circumstance without addressing this second limb is not a defence. Ask in writing for the specific event, its date and time, the aircraft registration, and the evidence relied on. An ADR adjudicator will expect the airline to produce it.

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 5 — Art. 5

"It was a technical fault"

high likelihood

The airline treats an unserviceable aircraft as automatically extraordinary.

What answers it

A technical problem is not, as such, an extraordinary circumstance (Wallentin-Hermann, C-549/07), and nor is a spontaneous component failure on a correctly maintained aircraft (van der Lans, C-257/14). Both remain assimilated case law in the UK. Only a hidden manufacturing defect revealed by the manufacturer or a competent authority, or sabotage, will do.

Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia, C-549/07

"It was the weather"

high likelihood

The airline cites weather generically, often on a day when most flights operated.

What answers it

Recital 14 requires conditions "incompatible with the operation of the flight concerned". Ask for the METAR and TAF for the airport and time window, and for an explanation of why other flights operated when yours did not.

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 5 — Art. 5

"We have offered you a voucher"

high likelihood

The airline offers vouchers and treats acceptance as settling the claim.

What answers it

Article 7(3) requires cash, bank transfer, bank order or cheque. Vouchers are permitted only with the signed agreement of the passenger. You have signed nothing and you decline.

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 7 — Art. 7

"But we re-routed you"

high likelihood

The airline says re-routing removes the compensation entirely.

What answers it

Article 7(2) provides a 50% REDUCTION, and only where the re-routed arrival was within two, three or four hours of the original by band. Re-routing discharges the Article 8 obligation; it is not an answer to Article 7.

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 7 — Art. 7

"The delay was under three hours"

high likelihood

The airline measures departure delay, or measures arrival to touchdown or on-blocks.

What answers it

The delay that counts is the one at your final destination, measured to the moment a door opened: Germanwings v Henning (C-452/13). Please state the door-open time.

Germanwings GmbH v Ronny Henning, C-452/13

"That was our partner airline, not us"

medium likelihood

The marketing and operating carriers point at each other.

What answers it

Article 2(b) defines the operating air carrier as the one that performs the flight, and every obligation falls on it. If you operated the flight you owe the compensation, whatever code was on the ticket.

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (assimilated, UK), Art. 2 — Art. 2

"The CAA has closed your case"

medium likelihood

The airline points to the CAA having taken no action, as though that were a determination that nothing is owed.

What answers it

The CAA supervises compliance; it does not adjudicate individual claims and has no power to order payment. Its closing a case decides nothing about your entitlement. The bodies that can decide are the approved ADR scheme and the court.

CAA — how the CAA can help

Where to take it next

  1. Write to ZZ — the operating carrierLiability attaches to the airline that operated the flight, not to the one whose code is on the ticket. Set out the flight, the delay at the final destination, the distance band and the sterling figure, and give them 14 days. Keep it in writing: the ADR schemes will want to see the correspondence.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Check whether your airline is in a CAA-approved ADR schemeWe do not hold a verified ADR scheme for ZZ. The CAA publishes which airlines belong to which approved body — AviationADR, CEDR, or a recognised foreign scheme — and applying to the wrong one gets your case returned. Check the list before writing.Alternative dispute resolutiontypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Complain to the CAA Passenger Advice and Complaints Team (PACT)Where the airline is NOT in an approved ADR scheme, PACT will review your complaint and put it to the airline. Be clear-eyed about what this achieves: unlike an ADR body, PACT cannot make a decision that binds the airline and cannot order it to pay you. It is pressure and a record of the breach, not a remedy. If the airline IS in an ADR scheme, use that instead — PACT will simply redirect you.Regulatortypically 60 daysofficial page
  4. County Court — Money Claim Online (England and Wales)Binding on themA claim of this size goes to the small claims track, where you present it yourself and the losing side does not normally pay the winner’s legal costs. Money Claim Online lets you issue without leaving the house; the issue fee is scaled to the claim value and is recoverable if you win. In Scotland the equivalent is the Simple Procedure in the sheriff court for claims up to GBP 5,000; in Northern Ireland it is the small claims procedure in the county court. Airlines settle a high proportion of these on receipt of the claim form.Small claimstypically 150 daysofficial page

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

England & Wales — tenancy deposit protection (Housing Act 2004 ss. 213–215)GB-EAWSub-nationalUnited KingdomHousing Act 2004, s. 213Confidence: highEngland & Wales — unclaimed estates and bona vacantia (Administration of Estates Act 1925 s. 46)GB-EAWSub-nationalUnited KingdomAdministration of Estates Act 1925 (c. 23), s. 46(1)(vi)Confidence: mediumGreat Britain — Delay RepayGBNationalUnited KingdomNational Rail Conditions of TravelConfidence: mediumNorthern Ireland — tenancy deposit schemes (SR 2012/373, as amended 2023)GB-NIRSub-nationalUnited KingdomTenancy Deposit Schemes Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2012Confidence: mediumScotland — tenancy deposit schemes (SSI 2011/176)GB-SCTSub-nationalUnited KingdomTenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011, reg. 3Confidence: highConsumer Credit Act 1974 s.75 (and s.75A) — creditor joint and several liabilityGBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Credit Act 1974, s.75Confidence: highUK Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 (and the not-yet-commenced DMCCA subscription regime)GBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/3134)Confidence: highUK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018GBNationalUnited KingdomUK GDPR Arts. 15–21 and Data Protection Act 2018Confidence: medium

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.