Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Australia — Australian Consumer Law consumer guarantees

NationalAURead off primary law

Australia

Rule id
air.au-acl
Version
1.0.0
In force from
January 1, 2011
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Australia

In plain language

What this regime says.

Australia has no EU261. There is no fixed sum, no distance table and no automatic entitlement. What there is instead are the consumer guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law — due care and skill, fitness for purpose, supply within a reasonable time — which cannot be contracted out of, and a remedy structure that gives the consumer the election between a refund and compensation where the failure is major, plus uncapped damages for reasonably foreseeable loss on top.

Who is covered

Anyone acquiring air travel as a consumer in trade or commerce in Australia. Section 63 excludes only goods transport for business purposes and insurance, so passenger carriage is squarely inside the guarantees.

What you get

For a major failure: a refund (by terminating) or compensation for the reduction in value, at your election under s 267(3). For a non-major remediable failure: a right to require a remedy and, if refused, to have it remedied elsewhere at the airline's cost. On top of either, damages for any reasonably foreseeable loss under s 267(4) — the head with no cap.

Where claims go wrong

  • There is no fixed compensation figure in Australian law. Claims framed as "I want my EUR 600 equivalent" get refused correctly.
  • The weather carve-out in s 267(1)(c) does NOT apply to the s 60 due-care-and-skill guarantee. That exception is the strongest point most passengers never make.
  • Where the failure is major, the election between refund and compensation belongs to you, not the airline. A unilateral credit voucher does not discharge it.
  • Section 64A does not let an airline cap its liability at re-supply for leisure travel.
  • The Aviation Consumer Ombuds Scheme is not yet operating. The interim ombudsperson has no power to resolve your complaint.
  • The ACCC will not resolve your individual complaint. The tribunal will.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Australian Consumer Law, s 60 (guarantee as to due care and skill)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 60 (guarantee as to due care and skill)
  2. Australian Consumer Law, s 61 (guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 61 (guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose)
  3. Australian Consumer Law, s 62 (guarantee as to reasonable time for supply)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 62 (guarantee as to reasonable time for supply)
  4. Australian Consumer Law, s 63 (services to which the Subdivision does not apply)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 63 (services to which the Subdivision does not apply)
  5. Australian Consumer Law, s 64A (limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 64A (limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees)
  6. Australian Consumer Law, s 267 (action against suppliers of services)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 267 (action against suppliers of services)
  7. Australian Consumer Law, s 268 (when a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 268 (when a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure)
  8. Australian Consumer Law, s 236(2) (6-year limitation for Chapter 2 and 3 contraventions)Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2 — the Australian Consumer Law (compilation C2026C00323, in force 1 July 2026)URL verified 2026-08-05s 236(2) (6-year limitation for Chapter 2 and 3 contraventions)

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Six years to sue (State and Territory limitation legislation)Varies by jurisdictionThe ACL itself sets no limitation period for a s 267 action against a supplier of services — s 236(2) supplies a six-year period, but only for Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 contraventions such as misleading or deceptive conduct, and s 273 covers only actions against manufacturers of goods. A consumer-guarantee claim therefore runs on the general limitation legislation of the relevant State or Territory, which is six years for contract in each of them. Verify the position in your State before relying on the last few months of it.Australian Consumer Law, s 236(2) (6-year limitation for Chapter 2 and 3 contraventions) — s 236(2) (6-year limitation for Chapter 2 and 3 contraventions)Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Ask the airline to fix it, then fix it yourself and bill themSection 267(2): require the airline to remedy the failure within a reasonable time. If it refuses or fails, you may have the failure remedied elsewhere and recover all reasonable costs from the airline, or terminate the contract. Make the request in writing, at the airport if you can, and keep it — the request is the precondition to the recovery.s 267 (action against suppliers of services)
  • Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

Australia has no compensation law, so nothing is owed

high likelihood

The airline correctly says there is no EU261 in Australia and treats that as the end of the discussion.

What answers it

The absence of a fixed scheme is not the absence of a right. The consumer guarantees in ss 60 to 62 of the Australian Consumer Law apply to air travel, cannot be excluded by the conditions of carriage, and carry the remedies in s 267 — including damages for reasonably foreseeable loss under s 267(4), which has no cap. Put the claim in guarantee-and-remedy language, not in EU261 language, and it stops being answerable that way.

Australian Consumer Law, s 267 (action against suppliers of services) — s 267 (action against suppliers of services)

It was weather, so section 267(1)(c) applies

high likelihood

The airline invokes the carve-out for a cause independent of human control and refuses any remedy.

What answers it

Read the whole of s 267(1)(c): the carve-out applies "unless the guarantee is the guarantee under section 60". Due care and skill survives the weather. The question is not whether there was a storm but what the airline did about it — how long it took to rebook you, whether it had a recovery plan, whether it kept you informed, whether it prioritised other passengers. Ask those questions in writing.

Australian Consumer Law, s 267 (action against suppliers of services) — s 267 (action against suppliers of services)

Our conditions of carriage exclude this

high likelihood

The airline points to a clause disclaiming liability for schedule changes, consequential loss, or limiting remedies to a re-fly or a credit.

What answers it

Sections 64 and 64A make such terms void or ineffective against a consumer. A term purporting to exclude, restrict or modify the guarantees is void; and the s 64A option of limiting liability to re-supply is not available for services of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use, which leisure air travel is. Ask the airline to identify the statutory basis on which it says the clause survives s 64.

Australian Consumer Law, s 64A (limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees) — s 64A (limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees)

Here is a travel credit

high likelihood

The airline issues a credit with an expiry date and treats it as satisfying the claim.

What answers it

Where the failure is major, s 267(3) gives the election to the consumer, not the supplier: you may terminate, which means a refund of money. A credit is an offer. Accepting it will usually settle the claim, so decline it in writing if you want the cash, and say you are exercising the s 267(3)(a) election.

Australian Consumer Law, s 267 (action against suppliers of services) — s 267 (action against suppliers of services)

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineFrame it as a consumer-guarantee claim, not a compensation request. Identify the guarantee (s 60, s 61 or s 62), say why the failure is major under s 268 if it is, state which s 267 remedy you elect, and itemise the s 267(4) loss with receipts.Claim directtypically 21 days
  2. Airline Customer AdvocateA free, independent facilitation service for unresolved complaints against the major Australian airlines. It confirmed it was operating in August 2026. It facilitates rather than determines, and it requires you to have complained to the airline first — but airlines answer it, and its file is useful at a tribunal.Alternative dispute resolutiontypically 30 daysofficial page
  3. ACCC or your State fair trading officeThe ACCC states that it does not resolve individual complaints about delayed or cancelled travel — it acts on systemic conduct. Report it anyway, because the pattern data drives enforcement, but do not wait for it. Your State or Territory fair trading office may conciliate individual disputes, which the ACCC will not.Regulatortypically 60 daysofficial page
  4. State or Territory civil and administrative tribunalBinding on themThis is where Australian air passenger claims are actually decided. NCAT hears consumer claims up to AUD 100,000; QCAT hears minor civil disputes up to AUD 25,000; VCAT's civil claims list publishes no monetary cap. Filing fees are modest and lawyers are usually not permitted. One trap: tribunals are not Chapter III courts, so a dispute between residents of different States can fall outside their jurisdiction — if you and the airline are in different States, take advice on whether a court is the right forum.Small claimstypically 120 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Australia — Australia Post compensation and Express Post guaranteeAUNationalAustraliaAustralian Postal Corporation Act 1989 and Australia Post’s Terms and ConditionsConfidence: lowAustralia — Australian Consumer Law unfair contract terms and misleading conductAUNationalAustraliaAustralian Consumer Law, ss.23-28 (unfair contract terms)Confidence: mediumAustralia — ePayments Code and Australian Consumer LawAUNationalAustraliaePayments Code (ASIC), Chapter CConfidence: mediumAustralia — Medicare, bulk billing, the MBS and informed financial consentAUNationalAustraliaHealth Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), s. 20AConfidence: mediumAustralia — Part IVA representative proceedingsAUNationalAustraliaFederal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), Part IVAConfidence: mediumAustralia — single price rule, ACL s.48AUNationalAustraliaAustralian Consumer Law, s.48 (Competition and Consumer Act 2010, Sch. 2)Confidence: mediumAustralia — State operator passenger charters (NSW TrainLink, V/Line, Queensland Rail) and the Australian Consumer LawAUNationalAustraliaAustralian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010, Schedule 2) and the state operators' customer chartersConfidence: lowAustralia — unclaimed money held by ASIC, and lost superannuation held by the ATOAUNationalAustraliaBanking Act 1959 (Cth), s. 69Confidence: medium

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.