Skip to content
Coverage

Class actions

Australia — Part IVA representative proceedings

NationalAUDerived or secondary source

Australia

Rule id
collective.au
Version
1.0.0
In force from
March 4, 1992
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Australia

In plain language

What this regime says.

Australia's Part IVA class action needs seven claimants and no certification, and group members are included automatically unless they opt out by the date the court fixes.

Who is covered

Everyone within the group definition, whether or not they know about the proceeding.

What you get

A share of a court-approved settlement or judgment, usually after registering in the settlement scheme. No figure is set by statute.

Where claims go wrong

  • Confusing being a group member with being paid. Most settlement schemes require registration by a deadline.
  • Opting out without a specific reason. Doing so gives up the group claim and leaves you to fund your own.
  • Not checking the Federal Court class actions page, which lists open proceedings and their key dates.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), Part IVAFederal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Commonwealth of Australia)URL verified 2026-08-05s.33C — a representative proceeding may be commenced where seven or more persons have claims against the same person arising out of the same, similar or related circumstances giving rise to a substantial common issue of law or fact; s.33E — the consent of group members is not required; s.33J — the court must fix a date before which a group member may opt out; s.33V — a representative proceeding may not be settled or discontinued without the approval of the court
  2. Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), s.33ZDA — group costs ordersSupreme Court Act 1986 (Victoria)URL verified 2026-08-05s.33ZDA — in a group proceeding in the Supreme Court of Victoria the court may order that the legal costs payable to the plaintiff's solicitor be a percentage of the amount recovered, shared among the plaintiff and group members. Victoria is the only Australian jurisdiction permitting contingency fees in this form

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • You are in by default — and you can leaveGroup members are included without their consent and without being named — s.33E says so expressly — and the court must fix a date by which a group member may opt out under s.33J. If you do nothing you are in, and you are bound by any judgment or court-approved settlement. Opting out is worth considering only if you intend to run your own case.s.33C — a representative proceeding may be commenced where seven or more persons have claims against the same person arising out of the same, similar or related circumstances giving rise to a substantial common issue of law or fact; s.33E — the consent of group members is not required; s.33J — the court must fix a date before which a group member may opt out; s.33V — a representative proceeding may not be settled or discontinued without the approval of the court
  • Your own individual claim is still thereCollective redress is an alternative route, not a replacement. Unless you are bound by a judgment or a settlement in a collective action, your individual claim under the ordinary law survives, and for a small sum it is usually the faster route. Check the other regimes in this result.

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"We can file your class-action claim for you — for a percentage"

high likelihood

A claims-filing service, a "settlement recovery" app or a law firm that is not class counsel contacts you offering to handle the claim, taking 15-40% of whatever arrives. Some buy the claim outright for a fraction of its value. Others harvest the personal data on the form.

What answers it

Filing is free, it is done on the administrator's own website, and it takes minutes. Class counsel are already paid out of the settlement — you do not retain anyone and you do not owe anyone a percentage. Several administrators now reject bulk third-party filings outright, and some settlement agreements void claims submitted by an aggregator, so using one can cost you the whole claim rather than a slice of it. The only address you should be entering your details into is the official settlement website named in the notice, which is also the only place that can tell you the real deadline.

"Up to $X" is read as an entitlement

high likelihood

The notice, the press coverage and the aggregators all quote the maximum per-claimant figure. It is read as an entitlement.

What answers it

"Up to" is a cap, not a promise. Almost every consumer settlement is a fixed fund divided among valid claims, so the per-claimant payment falls as the claims rate rises and is calculated only after the claims period closes, after the administrator validates claims, and after fees and costs come out. A settlement quoted at "up to $100" routinely pays single digits. That is not a reason to skip filing — the form is free and takes minutes — but it is a reason not to plan around the headline number.

Where to take it next

  1. Check the register of live collective actionsThis is the authoritative list of actions that have actually been brought. Search the trader's name. If an action is listed, the register entry will tell you the class or group definition, which is what decides whether you are covered.Collective actionofficial page
  2. Report it to Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionCollective actions start as patterns in a regulator's or consumer body's complaint data. A single report is free, takes minutes, and is the only mechanism by which a case like yours becomes a case at all. It does not give you money and should not be mistaken for a claim.Regulatortypically 60 daysofficial page
  3. Run your own individual claim in parallelDo not wait for a collective action. They take years, most never certify, and the individual routes in this result run on their own limitation periods that keep expiring while you wait. If a collective action later covers the same loss you simply give credit for anything already recovered.Claim directtypically 30 days

The same claim type elsewhere

Class or group settlement — are you inside the class definition?GLOBALSupranational — party states varyFed. R. Civ. P. 23Confidence: highBelgium — action en réparation collective (Code de droit économique, Book XVII)BENational — BelgiumCode de droit économique / Wetboek van economisch recht, Livre XVII, Titre 2 (arts. XVII.35 et seq.)Confidence: lowEuropean Union — Representative Actions Directive (EU) 2020/1828EUSupranational — 27 countriesDirective (EU) 2020/1828 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumersConfidence: highFrance — action de groupeFRNational — FranceAction de groupe — Code de la consommation, arts. L623-1 et seq., as reformed in 2025Confidence: lowGermany — Abhilfeklage and Musterfeststellungsklage (VDuG)DENational — GermanyVerbraucherrechtedurchsetzungsgesetz (VDuG)Confidence: mediumItaly — azione di classe (arts. 840-bis et seq. c.p.c.)ITNational — ItalyCodice di procedura civile, arts. 840-bis to 840-sexiesdecies (Legge 12 aprile 2019, n. 31)Confidence: mediumNetherlands — WAMCA collective damages actionsNLNational — NetherlandsWet afwikkeling massaschade in collectieve actie (WAMCA)Confidence: mediumPoland — group proceedings (postępowanie grupowe)PLNational — PolandUstawa z dnia 17 grudnia 2009 r. o dochodzeniu roszczeń w postępowaniu grupowymConfidence: low

Other rights in the same countries

Australia — Australia Post compensation and Express Post guaranteeAUNational — AustraliaAustralian Postal Corporation Act 1989 and Australia Post’s Terms and ConditionsConfidence: lowAustralia — Australian Consumer Law consumer guaranteesAUNational — AustraliaAustralian Consumer Law, s 60 (guarantee as to due care and skill)Confidence: highAustralia — Australian Consumer Law unfair contract terms and misleading conductAUNational — AustraliaAustralian Consumer Law, ss.23-28 (unfair contract terms)Confidence: mediumAustralia — ePayments Code and Australian Consumer LawAUNational — AustraliaePayments Code (ASIC), Chapter CConfidence: mediumAustralia — Medicare, bulk billing, the MBS and informed financial consentAUNational — AustraliaHealth Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), s. 20AConfidence: mediumAustralia — single price rule, ACL s.48AUNational — AustraliaAustralian Consumer Law, s.48 (Competition and Consumer Act 2010, Sch. 2)Confidence: mediumAustralia — State operator passenger charters (NSW TrainLink, V/Line, Queensland Rail) and the Australian Consumer LawAUNational — AustraliaAustralian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010, Schedule 2) and the state operators' customer chartersConfidence: lowAustralia — unclaimed money held by ASIC, and lost superannuation held by the ATOAUNational — AustraliaBanking Act 1959 (Cth), s. 69Confidence: medium

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Run your factsBack to the catalogue

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.