Skip to content
Letter library

Medical billing

Medical bill — request for an itemised statement

Always the first step. A summary bill cannot be checked; an itemised one frequently reveals duplicate lines, unbundled charges and services never received.

medical.itemised-bill-request8 languages14-day reply window

What it actually says.

Rendered live from invented facts: An emergency admission at an in-network hospital, billed by an out-of-network physician. The claimant is fictional and the figures are illustrative — your own claim produces its own numbers and its own citations.

The authority in the preview

It cites the article, not the act.

A document has to name the provision it relies on or it gets filed. These are the citations the sample evaluation put into the letter above; a real claim substitutes the ones its own regimes produced.
  1. 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-131No Surprises Act§ 300gg-131(a)

Where it comes from

The laws that can produce this document.

A rule module declares the documents its evaluation can render into. These are the regimes in the current catalogue that offer this one — each with its own citations, deadlines and escalation ladder.
EU cross-border healthcare — Directive 2011/24/EU reimbursement, the EHIC and the S2EUSupranational27 countriesDirective 2011/24/EU, Arts. 6, 7 and 8Confidence: highFrance — dépassements d'honoraires, secteur 1 and 2, and the OPTAMFRNationalFranceCode de la santé publique, art. R. 4127-53Confidence: mediumGermany — the GOÄ and GOZ private billing schedules and their multiplier limitsDENationalGermanyGebührenordnung für Ärzte (GOÄ), §§ 2, 5 and 12Confidence: mediumIreland — public hospital charges, medical cards and the HSE complaints routeIENationalIrelandHealth Act 1970 (as amended)Confidence: lowItaly — Servizio Sanitario Nazionale, the ticket and the URP routeITNationalItalyLegge 23 dicembre 1978, n. 833Confidence: lowNetherlands — NZa tariffs, the eigen risico and the SKGZ dispute routeNLNationalNetherlandsWet marktordening gezondheidszorg (Wmg), art. 35Confidence: mediumSpain — Sistema Nacional de Salud coverage and the right to economic informationESNationalSpainLey 41/2002, de autonomía del pacienteConfidence: lowUnited Kingdom — NHS charging, overseas visitor invoices and private healthcareGBNationalUnited KingdomNational Health Service Act 2006, s. 1(4)Confidence: mediumArizona surprise out-of-network bill dispute resolution (A.R.S. § 20-3111 et seq.)US-AZSub-nationalUnited StatesA.R.S. § 20-3111 et seq.Confidence: mediumCalifornia surprise-billing protections (AB 72; Health & Safety Code § 1371.9)US-CASub-nationalUnited StatesCal. Health & Safety Code § 1371.9Confidence: mediumCanada — the Canada Health Act prohibition on extra-billing and user chargesCANationalCanadaCanada Health Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-6, ss. 18-19Confidence: mediumColorado out-of-network payment and hold-harmless (C.R.S. § 10-16-704)US-COSub-nationalUnited StatesC.R.S. § 10-16-704Confidence: mediumConnecticut surprise-bill protections (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-477aa)US-CTSub-nationalUnited StatesConn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-477aaConfidence: mediumFlorida balance-billing protections (Fla. Stat. §§ 627.64194 and 641.3154)US-FLSub-nationalUnited StatesFla. Stat. § 627.64194Confidence: mediumGeorgia Surprise Billing Consumer Protection Act (O.C.G.A. § 33-20E-1 et seq.)US-GASub-nationalUnited StatesO.C.G.A. § 33-20E-1 et seq.Confidence: mediumIllinois Network Adequacy and Transparency Act (215 ILCS 124)US-ILSub-nationalUnited States215 ILCS 124/25Confidence: mediumMaine surprise-bill protections (24-A M.R.S. § 4303-E)US-MESub-nationalUnited States24-A M.R.S. § 4303-EConfidence: mediumMaryland non-participating provider reimbursement (Md. Code, Insurance § 14-205.2)US-MDSub-nationalUnited StatesMd. Code, Insurance § 14-205.2Confidence: lowMichigan out-of-network care provisions (Public Acts 234 and 235 of 2020)US-MISub-nationalUnited StatesMichigan Public Acts 234 and 235 of 2020, amending the Public Health Code and the Insurance CodeConfidence: lowNew Hampshire balance-billing protectionsUS-NHSub-nationalUnited StatesNew Hampshire insurance statutes on out-of-network and emergency care billingConfidence: lowNew Jersey Out-of-network Consumer Protection, Transparency, Cost Containment and Accountability ActUS-NJSub-nationalUnited StatesN.J.S.A. 26:2SS-1 et seq.Confidence: mediumNew Mexico Surprise Billing Protection Act (NMSA 1978, §§ 59A-57-1 to -11)US-NMSub-nationalUnited StatesNMSA 1978, §§ 59A-57-1 to -11Confidence: mediumNew York surprise bill protections (Financial Services Law art. 6)US-NYSub-nationalUnited StatesN.Y. Financial Services Law art. 6, §§ 601-607Confidence: mediumOregon out-of-network provider reimbursement (ORS 743B.287)US-ORSub-nationalUnited StatesORS 743B.287Confidence: mediumPennsylvania — federal protections and the Insurance Department routeUS-PASub-nationalUnited StatesPennsylvania Insurance Department consumer servicesConfidence: lowTexas balance-billing prohibition (SB 1264; Insurance Code ch. 1467)US-TXSub-nationalUnited StatesTex. Ins. Code ch. 1467Confidence: mediumGood Faith Estimate and patient-provider dispute resolution (uninsured and self-pay)USNationalUnited StatesPHS Act § 2799B-6, 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-136Confidence: highMedicare and Medicaid billing limits, the QMB prohibition and the appeals ladderUSNationalUnited States42 U.S.C. § 1395u(b)(3)(B)(ii)Confidence: highNo Surprises Act (federal balance-billing protections)USNationalUnited StatesPHS Act § 2799A-1(a), 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-111(a)Confidence: highUS medical billing errors, plan appeals, non-profit hospital obligations and medical debt collectionUSNationalUnited States45 CFR § 164.524Confidence: highVirginia balance-billing protections (Va. Code § 38.2-3445.01 et seq.)US-VASub-nationalUnited StatesVa. Code § 38.2-3445.01 et seq.Confidence: mediumWashington Balance Billing Protection Act (ch. 48.49 RCW)US-WASub-nationalUnited StatesRCW ch. 48.49Confidence: mediumBrazil — planos de saúde, the ANS rol de procedimentos and the consumer routeBRNationalBrazilLei nº 9.656, de 3 de junho de 1998Confidence: mediumSouth Africa — prescribed minimum benefits and the Council for Medical SchemesZANationalSouth AfricaMedical Schemes Act 131 of 1998 and the Regulations made under itConfidence: lowUnited Arab Emirates — mandatory health insurance and the emirate health authoritiesAENationalUnited Arab EmiratesDubai Law No. 11 of 2013 concerning Health Insurance in the Emirate of Dubai, and the Abu Dhabi health insurance schemeConfidence: lowIndia — the Clinical Establishments Act rate-display duty and the consumer forum routeINNationalIndiaClinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010Confidence: lowJapan — the national fee schedule and the high-cost medical expense benefitJPNationalJapanHealth Insurance Act (健康保険法) and the National Health Insurance Act (国民健康保険法)Confidence: lowSingapore — MOH fee benchmarks, MediShield Life and the licensing routeSGNationalSingaporeHealthcare Services Act 2020Confidence: lowAustralia — Medicare, bulk billing, the MBS and informed financial consentAUNationalAustraliaHealth Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), s. 20AConfidence: medium

The rest of the sequence

Documents are written to be worked through in order: the opening demand, then the answer to whatever they refuse with, then the escalation. Sending the last one first usually costs you the first two.

You send it

Fill in your own facts and this letter writes itself.

The claim wizard produces this document with your figures, your citations and your deadline already in it. You still print it, sign it and post it yourself — that part is not delegable and we would not take it if it were.

Duesday is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. This document is an editable template assembled from publicly available law. You are responsible for checking that the facts and the law stated are correct for your situation, and you send it yourself in your own name. Nothing here creates a solicitor–client or attorney–client relationship, and no outcome is promised.