Skip to content
Coverage

Medical billing

France — dépassements d'honoraires, secteur 1 and 2, and the OPTAM

NationalFRDerived or secondary source

France

Rule id
medical.fr
Version
1.0.0
In force from
August 13, 2004
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
France

In plain language

What this regime says.

French fees depend on the practitioner's sector. Secteur 2 practitioners set fees freely but must do so "avec tact et mesure", and those who have signed the OPTAM accept limits in exchange for better reimbursement for their patients.

Who is covered

People treated by health professionals in France.

What you get

A fee note, an estimate where one was required, conciliation through the CPAM, and enforcement of the "tact et mesure" obligation through the Ordre.

Where claims go wrong

  • Not checking the practitioner's sector and OPTAM status on the annuaire santé before booking.
  • Assuming the mutuelle will absorb the dépassement. Many cover only a multiple of the conventional tariff.

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Code de la santé publique, art. R. 4127-53Code de la santé publique (Code de déontologie médicale)URL verified 2026-08-05art. R. 4127-53 — a physician's fees must be determined "avec tact et mesure", having regard to the regulations, the nature of the services and other relevant circumstances
  2. Code de la sécurité socialeCode de la sécurité socialeURL verified 2026-08-05Provisions governing the conventions médicales, the tarifs de responsabilité, and the reimbursement of consultations by the assurance maladie

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Fees set "avec tact et mesure"A professional obligation enforceable through the Ordre des médecins, not merely a guideline. A dépassement far outside the local norm for the same act is the paradigm case.
  • A written estimate before treatment above the regulated thresholdWhere one was required and not given, say so: it is a breach independent of whether the fee itself was excessive.
  • Conciliation through the CPAMThe caisse primaire d'assurance maladie operates a conciliation service for fee disputes, which is free and often effective without going to the Ordre.

Where to take it next

  1. Write to the practitioner asking for the fee note and the basis of the dépassementAsk which act was billed, at what conventional tariff, and what the dépassement represents. Ask for the estimate if one should have been given.Claim directtypically 21 days
  2. Conciliation at the CPAMFree conciliation service for fee disputes between patients and practitioners.Alternative dispute resolutiontypically 60 daysofficial page
  3. Conseil départemental de l'Ordre des médecinsThe Ordre enforces the "tact et mesure" obligation and can require a practitioner to justify a fee. Complaints are free.Regulatortypically 120 days
  4. Défenseur des droitsWhere the dispute involves access to care or a public service failure rather than a purely private fee question.Ombudsmantypically 150 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.