Skip to content
Coverage

Subscriptions

United States — state automatic-renewal statutes (excluding California)

Sub-nationalUSSTATESDerived or secondary source

United States — state automatic-renewal statutes (multi-state module)

Rule id
subscription.us-state-arl
Version
1.0.0
In force from
December 1, 2010
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
United States

In plain language

What this regime says.

Around twenty US states require an automatic renewal to be clearly disclosed before you consent, separately agreed to, reminded about before it charges you, and cancellable as easily as you signed up. Since the federal click-to-cancel rule was vacated in July 2025 these state statutes are the enforceable obligations, and most route into a state consumer-protection act that lets you sue.

Who is covered

Consumers in states with an automatic-renewal statute. California has its own, stronger, regime — see the California result. Even in states without a dedicated statute, the unfair-and-deceptive-practices act applies.

What you get

Cancellation, refund of charges taken under the non-compliant arrangement, and — through the state consumer-protection act — often statutory or multiplied damages and attorney's fees.

Where claims go wrong

  • Relying on the vacated federal rule instead of your state statute.
  • Not checking whether a renewal reminder was due. Several states require one and traders often skip it.
  • Cancelling only with the merchant and not revoking the payment authority with the bank.
  • Letting the 60-day card-dispute window pass while arguing with the merchant.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. State automatic-renewal statutes (multi-state)State automatic renewal and negative-option statutes of the United StatesAround twenty states impose disclosure, affirmative-consent, renewal-reminder and easy-cancellation obligations on automatic renewals. Requirements and section numbers vary and are amended frequently.
  2. New York General Business Law § 527-aNew York General Business Law, art. 29-BBAutomatic renewal of service contracts: clear and conspicuous disclosure, affirmative consent, cancellation in the same medium used to enrol
  3. Illinois Automatic Contract Renewal Act, 815 ILCS 601Automatic Contract Renewal Act (Illinois)Clear and conspicuous disclosure of automatic renewal terms and a cost-effective, timely and easy-to-use cancellation mechanism
  4. Colorado Revised Statutes § 6-1-737Colorado Consumer Protection Act (automatic renewal provisions, added by SB 23-179)Renewal reminder notices for longer subscription terms and an easy cancellation mechanism
  5. Vermont Statutes Annotated, tit. 9, § 2454aVermont Consumer Protection Act — automatic renewal provisionsSeparate affirmative opt-in to the automatic renewal, and notice before renewal, for contracts with an initial term of one year or more that renew for a term of more than one month
  6. Connecticut General Statutes § 42-126bConnecticut General Statutes, ch. 739aAutomatic renewal of consumer contracts: written notice before renewal for longer terms
  7. Florida Statutes § 501.165Florida Statutes, ch. 501 (Consumer Protection)Automatic renewal contracts: clear and conspicuous disclosure of the renewal terms and written notice before renewal of longer-term contracts
  8. Tennessee Code Annotated § 47-18-505Tennessee Consumer Protection ActAutomatic renewal of service contracts: disclosure and notice requirements
  9. Code of Virginia § 59.1-207.46Code of Virginia, tit. 59.1, ch. 17.7Automatic renewal or continuous service offers: disclosure, affirmative consent and an online cancellation route for online sign-ups
  10. Oregon Revised Statutes § 646A.295Oregon Revised Statutes, ch. 646AAutomatic renewal and continuous service offers: disclosure, consent and cancellation
  11. D.C. Code § 28-3904District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures ActUnlawful trade practices, including automatic renewal disclosure and cancellation requirements
  12. Delaware Code, tit. 6 — automatic renewal provisionsDelaware Code, Title 6 (Commerce and Trade)
  13. Utah Code — automatic renewal provisionsUtah Code (Commerce and Trade)
  14. North Dakota Century Code — automatic renewal provisionsNorth Dakota Century Code
  15. Minnesota Statutes — automatic renewal and negative option provisionsMinnesota Statutes (Consumer Protection)

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • State consumer-protection act limitation (commonly 3-4 years)Limitation periods under state consumer-protection acts commonly run three or four years from the practice or from discovery, but they vary — a few are as short as one year. Check your state before assuming a claim is dead, and note that continuing charges usually restart the clock.Limitation period
  • Card dispute deadline (60 days from the statement)The genuinely urgent deadline is the card one: 60 days from the statement for a Regulation Z or Regulation E notice, and roughly 120 days for a network chargeback. Do that first.Notice period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Immediate cancellation and no further chargesSend a dated written cancellation and keep proof. State expressly that any further charge is unauthorised — that sentence is what converts the next debit into a card-dispute matter.Around twenty states impose disclosure, affirmative-consent, renewal-reminder and easy-cancellation obligations on automatic renewals. Requirements and section numbers vary and are amended frequently.
  • Your state consumer-protection act does the heavy liftingEvery state has an unfair-and-deceptive-practices statute, and most give a private right of action with statutory or multiplied damages and attorney's fees. That is usually the vehicle for an automatic-renewal claim, and the fee-shifting is what makes a small claim worth a lawyer's attention.Around twenty states impose disclosure, affirmative-consent, renewal-reminder and easy-cancellation obligations on automatic renewals. Requirements and section numbers vary and are amended frequently.
  • Revoke the payment authority with your bankDo not rely on the merchant to stop billing. On a debit card, 12 CFR § 1005.10(c) gives a stop-payment right on three business days' notice; on a credit card, ask the issuer to revoke the recurring authority.

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"You accepted the terms, which disclosed the renewal"

high likelihood

The trader points at a terms page or a single acceptance checkbox.

What answers it

These statutes require the automatic renewal terms to be clear and conspicuous and presented close to the request for consent, and several require consent to the renewal separately from acceptance of the contract as a whole — Vermont expressly so for contracts of a year or more. A link, or one box covering everything, does not satisfy that.

"We were not required to remind you"

high likelihood

The trader denies any obligation to send a renewal notice.

What answers it

Several states require exactly that — Colorado, Connecticut, Florida and others require notice before the automatic renewal of a longer-term contract, and free-trial conversions attract reminder duties in most of the statutes. Ask the trader to identify the state law it says applies and to confirm whether a reminder was sent and when.

"The FTC rule was struck down, so there is no requirement"

medium likelihood

The trader treats the vacatur of the federal negative-option rule as removing its obligations.

What answers it

The Eighth Circuit vacated a federal rule on procedural grounds. It did not touch ROSCA, it did not touch section 5 of the FTC Act, and it certainly did not touch state law. State automatic-renewal statutes are unaffected and several were strengthened during 2024 and 2025.

Where to take it next

  1. Written cancellation and refund demandCite your state's automatic-renewal statute and its unfair-and-deceptive-practices act. Demand cancellation and refund of every charge taken under the non-compliant arrangement.Claim directtypically 14 days
  2. Card dispute for the post-cancellation chargesA charge taken after authority was withdrawn is unauthorised. Use 12 CFR § 1026.13 on a credit card or 12 CFR § 1005.11 on a debit card, and ask for the recurring authority to be cancelled at the same time.Claim directtypically 30 days
  3. State attorney general consumer divisionState AGs enforce both the automatic-renewal statute and the consumer-protection act, and they also have ROSCA enforcement power under 15 U.S.C. § 8404(d). Complaints are free, take minutes, and consumer divisions routinely obtain refunds by informal mediation.Regulatortypically 60 days
  4. Federal Trade CommissionReportFraud.ftc.gov. Individual reports build the pattern the Commission needs and put your transaction inside any future redress fund. The FTC has continued to bring ROSCA cases since the negative-option rule was vacated.Regulatorofficial page
  5. Small claims courtLimits run from about $5,000 to $25,000 depending on the state, with no lawyers and a filing fee usually under $100. Where the state consumer-protection act provides statutory damages and fee-shifting, a subscription claim is well worth bringing.Small claimstypically 120 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

EU Consumer Rights Directive — withdrawal, order-button and inertia-selling rulesEUSupranational30 countriesDirective 2011/83/EU (Consumer Rights Directive)Confidence: highNorway — Angrerettloven right of withdrawalNONationalNorwayLov om opplysningsplikt og angrerett (angrerettloven), LOV-2014-06-20-27Confidence: highRussia — Consumer Rights Protection Law arts. 26.1 and 32RUNationalRussiaЗакон РФ от 07.02.1992 № 2300-1 «О защите прав потребителей», ст. 32Confidence: mediumSwitzerland — Code of Obligations right of revocation (and the online gap)CHNationalSwitzerlandSwiss Code of Obligations, arts. 40a–40fConfidence: mediumTürkiye — Law 6502 distance contracts and the Subscription Contracts RegulationTRNationalTürkiyeTüketicinin Korunması Hakkında Kanun No. 6502, arts. 48 and 52Confidence: mediumUK Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 (and the not-yet-commenced DMCCA subscription regime)GBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/3134)Confidence: highCalifornia Automatic Renewal Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17600-17606, as amended by AB 2863)US-CASub-nationalUnited StatesCalifornia Business and Professions Code §§ 17600-17606Confidence: highCanada — provincial consumer protection acts and the federal Competition ActCANationalCanadaLoi sur la protection du consommateur, RLRQ c. P-40.1 (Quebec)Confidence: medium

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.