Flight disruption
South Africa — Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 applied to air carriage
South Africa
- Rule id
- air.za-cpa
- Version
- 1.0.0
- In force from
- April 1, 2011
- Last read against its sources
- August 5, 2026
- Countries bound
- South Africa
In plain language
What this regime says.
South Africa has no dedicated air passenger compensation regulation. Airlines are suppliers of services under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008, and s. 54 gives a passenger the right to require a refund of a reasonable portion of the price where the service was not performed to the standard generally expected. That is a real statutory entitlement without a fixed figure.
Who is covered
Consumers supplied with air carriage in South Africa.
What you get
Under s. 54, remedy of the defect or a refund of a reasonable portion of the price having regard to the extent of the failure. Under s. 17, limits on cancellation charges. On international carriage, Montreal Convention damages through the Carriage by Air Act. There is no fixed compensation figure.
Where claims go wrong
- Expecting an EU261-style tariff. South Africa has not made one and the SACAA does not administer one.
- Asking for "compensation" instead of citing s. 54(2)(b) and asking for a refund of a reasonable portion of the price.
- Going to the SACAA for money. The National Consumer Commission and the Small Claims Court are where the remedy is.
- Treating a non-refundable fare as entirely forfeit. Section 17 limits what a supplier may keep.
Authority
Every citation,
with its pinpoint.
- Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (South Africa), ss. 17, 19 and 54Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (South Africa) — s. 17 (right to cancel an advance reservation and the limits on a cancellation penalty), s. 19 (delivery of goods or supply of services at the agreed time), s. 54 (right to demand quality service and to require a refund of a reasonable portion of the price where it is not delivered)URL verified 2026-08-05ss. 17, 19, 54
- Carriage by Air Act 17 of 1946 (South Africa)Carriage by Air Act 17 of 1946 (South Africa), as amended, which gives effect in South African law to the Montreal Convention 1999URL verified 2026-08-05
- Decision Relating to the Implementation of the Yamoussoukro Declaration Concerning the Liberalisation of Access to Air Transport Markets in Africa (Yamoussoukro Decision)Yamoussoukro Decision, adopted 14 November 1999 and endorsed by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organisation of African Unity in July 2000; implemented through the Single African Air Transport Market (SAATM) launched by the African Union in January 2018, with the African Civil Aviation Commission as executing agencyURL verified 2026-08-05
Sources
Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.
- South African Civil Aviation Authority. The SACAA regulates safety and licensing. South Africa has not made a dedicated air passenger compensation regulation, and the SACAA does not administer one — air passengers are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act.South African Civil Aviation Authorityretrieved 2026-08-05
- National Consumer Commission — the enforcement body under the Consumer Protection ActNational Consumer Commission, South Africaretrieved 2026-08-05
What it imposes
Clocks, defences and the ladder.
The clocks it starts
- Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period
What it entitles you to, beyond money
- Section 54: a refund of a reasonable portion of the priceThis is the operative provision and almost nobody cites it. Section 54(1) entitles a consumer to the timely performance of services and to services of a quality that persons are generally entitled to expect. Section 54(2) lets the consumer require the supplier either to remedy the defect or to refund a reasonable portion of the price, having regard to the extent of the failure. Applied to a flight that went five hours late, that is an argument for a material refund of the fare — not a fixed figure, but a statutory entitlement to something, which is more than a request for goodwill.
- Section 17 and cancellation charges, in both directionsSection 17 governs advance reservations and limits the cancellation penalty a supplier may impose to a reasonable charge, taking into account the nature of the service, how far in advance the cancellation came and the general practice of the industry. Airlines rely on it when you cancel. It also constrains what they can keep when the reservation does not go ahead, and it is worth reading before accepting that a non-refundable fare is entirely forfeit.
- The Montreal Convention through the Carriage by Air ActOn international carriage the Carriage by Air Act 17 of 1946, as amended, gives effect to the Montreal Convention in South African law. Art. 19 gives a claim for the loss the delay actually caused, which runs alongside the Consumer Protection Act claim rather than replacing it — though on international carriage a court may treat the Convention as exclusive for damages, so plead the regulatory and contractual limbs separately.
- Ask whether the African Union consumer regulation has been domesticatedThe Yamoussoukro Decision is implemented through a set of regulations that includes one on the protection of consumers of air transport services, administered through the African Civil Aviation Commission. Whether it gives you an enforceable right depends on whether your state has brought it into domestic law, which varies across the continent and which we have not verified state by state. It is worth one line in your complaint to the national authority: ask whether the African Union consumer protection regulation applies to your flight and, if so, what it provides. The answer is either a right you did not know you had or a clear statement that the national regulation is the only one in play.
- Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)
Where to take it next
- Written claim to the airlineWrite to the carrier citing s. 54(2)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act and asking for a refund of a reasonable portion of the fare, stating what the failure was and what it cost you. Naming the section changes the conversation: most airline complaint teams in South Africa know exactly what it means.Claim directtypically 30 days
- National Consumer CommissionThe NCC enforces the Consumer Protection Act and takes complaints against suppliers including airlines. It can refer a matter to the National Consumer Tribunal.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
- South African Civil Aviation AuthorityThe SACAA regulates safety and licensing rather than consumer redress, and it will not order a refund. It is the right destination for a complaint about a carrier's licence conditions or conduct, and the wrong one for a delay claim.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
- Small Claims Court or the Magistrates' CourtBinding on themThe Small Claims Court hears claims up to R 20,000 with no lawyers and no fee, and is a realistic route for a fare refund. The National Consumer Tribunal is the alternative where the complaint is a contravention of the Consumer Protection Act rather than a money claim.Small claimstypically 180 days
Documents
What this regime can produce.
The same claim type elsewhere
Other rights in the same countries
Does this one reach your facts?
The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.
Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.