Skip to content
Coverage

Unwanted calls

India TRAI Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations 2018

NationalINDerived or secondary source

India

Rule id
calls.in-tcccpr
Version
1.0.0
In force from
July 19, 2018
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
India

In plain language

What this regime says.

Set DND preferences with your operator, report spam within 7 days via 1909 or the operator app, and expect enforcement against the sender rather than payment to you.

Who is covered

People receiving unsolicited marketing calls, texts or faxes on a number in India.

What you get

No money. A preference registration that reduces the calls, and a regulator complaint that can lead to a penalty paid to the state.

Where claims go wrong

  • Expecting a per-call payment. That is a United States feature and it does not exist here.
  • Missing the 7-day complaint window. Complain the same day.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations, 2018 (TCCCPR)Telecom Regulatory Authority of India regulationsURL verified 2026-08-05as amended 12 February 2025

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • India: window to report the callThe February 2025 amendment extended the window for reporting a spam communication from 3 days to 7 days from receipt. It also removed the requirement to have registered a DND preference before complaining — you can now complain about an unregistered sender whether or not you had opted out.Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations, 2018 (TCCCPR) — as amended 12 February 2025Referral to the regulator

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • An enforceable requirement that they stopEvery regime here requires a caller to stop on request, and to identify itself. Send a written objection to any caller you can name, keep the date, and report continued contact — repeat contact after an objection is the breach regulators move on.as amended 12 February 2025

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"It was not us, it was a lead generator"

high likelihood

We did not place that call. It was made by an independent marketing partner and we are not responsible for their conduct.

What answers it

The TCPA reaches calls made "on behalf of" a seller, and the FCC has long held that a seller can be vicariously liable on ordinary federal agency principles — actual authority, apparent authority, or ratification. Ask, in writing, for the identity of the lead generator, the contract governing the campaign, and the record of the consent they say they obtained for your number. A seller that took the sale but disclaims the call has to explain how it accepted the benefit without ratifying the conduct.

"You gave consent on a website"

high likelihood

Our records show you consented to receive marketing calls when you filled in a form on [some website].

What answers it

Then ask for the record. Prior express written consent has to be a signed agreement, identifying the seller, disclosing that signing authorises automated or prerecorded marketing calls to a designated number, and disclosing that signing is not a condition of purchase. Demand the actual capture: the URL, the timestamp, the IP address, the exact disclosure text shown, and the number entered. Very often the record is a purchased lead with none of this, or a number that is not yours.

"We were trying to reach someone else"

medium likelihood

This number was previously held by our customer. We had consent; we simply did not know it had been reassigned.

What answers it

Good faith about a reassigned number is not a defence once you have told them. Every call after your first "stop" or "wrong number" is knowingly made to a non-consenting party, and is the strongest part of your claim. Record the date you first told them.

"We have an established business relationship with you"

medium likelihood

You are an existing customer, so the do-not-call rules do not apply to us.

What answers it

The established-business-relationship exemption to the national registry is time-limited and defeasible: it runs 18 months from your last transaction, or three months from an inquiry, and it evaporates the moment you ask them to stop. It has never been a defence to the separate prohibition on prerecorded marketing calls without prior express written consent.

Where to take it next

  1. Written objection to the callerAsk them to stop, in writing, and to confirm they have removed your number. Ask on what basis they believe they had your consent, and for a copy of it. Keep everything.Claim directtypically 28 days
  2. Complain to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), through your own access providerComplain to your own mobile operator first — that is how the system is designed to work — through their DND app, the 1909 short code, or SMS to 1909. TRAI supervises the access providers rather than handling individual complaints itself.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

India — DGCA Civil Aviation Requirements, Section 3 Series M Part IVINNationalIndiaDGCA CAR Section 3, Series M, Part IV, Paras 1.2, 1.3 and 1.7Confidence: highIndia — India PostINNationalIndiaPost Office Act 2023 and the Department of Posts rules and compensation scheduleConfidence: lowIndia — IRCTC Ticket Deposit Receipt (TDR) refunds for cancelled and substantially delayed trainsINNationalIndiaRailway Passengers (Cancellation of Tickets and Refund of Fare) RulesConfidence: lowIndia — RBI e-mandate framework for recurring paymentsINNationalIndiaRBI circular DPSS.CO.PD.No.447/02.14.003/2019-20 (21 August 2019) — Processing of e-mandate on cards for recurring transactionsConfidence: mediumIndia — RBI limited liability for unauthorised electronic banking transactionsINNationalIndiaRBI/2017-18/15 — Customer Protection: Limiting Liability of Customers in Unauthorised Electronic Banking Transactions (6 July 2017)Confidence: highIndia — representative consumer complaints and s.245 Companies Act class actionsINNationalIndiaConsumer Protection Act 2019, s.35(1)(c) and s.2(5)Confidence: lowIndia — security deposit (Model Tenancy Act 2021 where adopted, otherwise State Rent Acts)INNationalIndiaModel Tenancy Act, 2021Confidence: lowIndia — the Clinical Establishments Act rate-display duty and the consumer forum routeINNationalIndiaClinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010Confidence: low

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.