Skip to content
Coverage

Unwanted calls

UK Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003

NationalGBDerived or secondary source

United Kingdom

Rule id
calls.uk-pecr
Version
1.0.0
In force from
December 11, 2003
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
United Kingdom

In plain language

What this regime says.

Register with the TPS, report to the ICO, and understand that reg. 30 compensation requires proof of damage. There is no per-call tariff.

Who is covered

People receiving unsolicited marketing calls, texts or faxes on a number in United Kingdom.

What you get

Compensation only where you can prove actual damage, plus a preference registration and a regulator complaint.

Where claims go wrong

  • Expecting a per-call payment. That is a United States feature and it does not exist here.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, regs. 19–24 and reg. 30The Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426)URL verified 2026-08-05regs. 19, 21, 21A, 21B, 22, 23, 24, 30

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • United Kingdom: limitation for a compensation claimA reg. 30 compensation claim is a statutory tort; the ordinary six-year limitation period under the Limitation Act 1980 s. 2 is the period generally applied. This was not independently verified.Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, regs. 19–24 and reg. 30 — regs. 19, 21, 21A, 21B, 22, 23, 24, 30Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • An enforceable requirement that they stopEvery regime here requires a caller to stop on request, and to identify itself. Send a written objection to any caller you can name, keep the date, and report continued contact — repeat contact after an objection is the breach regulators move on.regs. 19, 21, 21A, 21B, 22, 23, 24, 30

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"It was not us, it was a lead generator"

high likelihood

We did not place that call. It was made by an independent marketing partner and we are not responsible for their conduct.

What answers it

The TCPA reaches calls made "on behalf of" a seller, and the FCC has long held that a seller can be vicariously liable on ordinary federal agency principles — actual authority, apparent authority, or ratification. Ask, in writing, for the identity of the lead generator, the contract governing the campaign, and the record of the consent they say they obtained for your number. A seller that took the sale but disclaims the call has to explain how it accepted the benefit without ratifying the conduct.

"You gave consent on a website"

high likelihood

Our records show you consented to receive marketing calls when you filled in a form on [some website].

What answers it

Then ask for the record. Prior express written consent has to be a signed agreement, identifying the seller, disclosing that signing authorises automated or prerecorded marketing calls to a designated number, and disclosing that signing is not a condition of purchase. Demand the actual capture: the URL, the timestamp, the IP address, the exact disclosure text shown, and the number entered. Very often the record is a purchased lead with none of this, or a number that is not yours.

"We were trying to reach someone else"

medium likelihood

This number was previously held by our customer. We had consent; we simply did not know it had been reassigned.

What answers it

Good faith about a reassigned number is not a defence once you have told them. Every call after your first "stop" or "wrong number" is knowingly made to a non-consenting party, and is the strongest part of your claim. Record the date you first told them.

"We have an established business relationship with you"

medium likelihood

You are an existing customer, so the do-not-call rules do not apply to us.

What answers it

The established-business-relationship exemption to the national registry is time-limited and defeasible: it runs 18 months from your last transaction, or three months from an inquiry, and it evaporates the moment you ask them to stop. It has never been a defence to the separate prohibition on prerecorded marketing calls without prior express written consent.

Where to take it next

  1. Written objection to the callerAsk them to stop, in writing, and to confirm they have removed your number. Ask on what basis they believe they had your consent, and for a copy of it. Keep everything.Claim directtypically 28 days
  2. Complain to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)The ICO takes reports of nuisance calls and texts from individuals and uses them to build enforcement cases. It fines callers; it does not pay complainants. Since the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 raised the PECR ceiling on 5 February 2026, the maximum penalty is the higher of GBP 17.5 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover — up from GBP 500,000 — which has materially changed the ICO's leverage. Report every call: the ICO's cases are built from volume.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Small claims / simplified civil procedureBinding on themOnly worth it where you can articulate real damage and can name the caller. The claim is for your loss, not for a per-call tariff, and the caller may have a reasonable-care defence.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

England & Wales — tenancy deposit protection (Housing Act 2004 ss. 213–215)GB-EAWSub-nationalUnited KingdomHousing Act 2004, s. 213Confidence: highEngland & Wales — unclaimed estates and bona vacantia (Administration of Estates Act 1925 s. 46)GB-EAWSub-nationalUnited KingdomAdministration of Estates Act 1925 (c. 23), s. 46(1)(vi)Confidence: mediumGreat Britain — Delay RepayGBNationalUnited KingdomNational Rail Conditions of TravelConfidence: mediumNorthern Ireland — tenancy deposit schemes (SR 2012/373, as amended 2023)GB-NIRSub-nationalUnited KingdomTenancy Deposit Schemes Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2012Confidence: mediumScotland — tenancy deposit schemes (SSI 2011/176)GB-SCTSub-nationalUnited KingdomTenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011, reg. 3Confidence: highConsumer Credit Act 1974 s.75 (and s.75A) — creditor joint and several liabilityGBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Credit Act 1974, s.75Confidence: highUK Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013 (and the not-yet-commenced DMCCA subscription regime)GBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/3134)Confidence: highUK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018GBNationalUnited KingdomUK GDPR Arts. 15–21 and Data Protection Act 2018Confidence: medium

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.