Skip to content
Coverage

Class actions

India — representative consumer complaints and s.245 Companies Act class actions

NationalINUnverified — check before relying on it

India

Rule id
collective.in
Version
1.0.0
In force from
July 20, 2020
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
India

In plain language

What this regime says.

India allows a consumer complaint to be brought on behalf of numerous consumers with the same interest, with the Commission's permission, and provides a separate class action for company members and depositors before the NCLT.

Who is covered

Consumers having the same interest as the complainant, as the Commission's order defines them.

What you get

Whatever the Commission orders. We state no figure or threshold for this regime.

Where claims go wrong

  • Assuming a class action in the US sense exists for consumers. It does not; the consumer route is a representative complaint requiring permission.
  • Confusing the Companies Act s.245 class action, which is for members and depositors, with a consumer remedy.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Consumer Protection Act 2019, s.35(1)(c) and s.2(5)India — Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (Act No. 35 of 2019)s.2(5) and s.35(1)(c) — a complaint may be filed by one or more consumers, where there are numerous consumers having the same interest, on behalf of or for the benefit of all consumers so interested, with the permission of the District Commission. The Central Consumer Protection Authority constituted under s.10 may also act to protect consumers as a class
  2. Companies Act 2013, s.245India — Companies Act, 2013s.245 — a prescribed number of members or depositors may apply to the National Company Law Tribunal for orders against a company, its directors, auditors or advisers, where the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the company, its members or depositors

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • A route into a collective action, if one existsA representative consumer complaint requires the Commission's permission and proceeds for the benefit of the consumers having the same interest; how those consumers come to share in the outcome depends on the order made. We could not source the current procedural detail and state nothing about automatic inclusion.s.2(5) and s.35(1)(c) — a complaint may be filed by one or more consumers, where there are numerous consumers having the same interest, on behalf of or for the benefit of all consumers so interested, with the permission of the District Commission. The Central Consumer Protection Authority constituted under s.10 may also act to protect consumers as a class
  • Your own individual claim is still thereCollective redress is an alternative route, not a replacement. Unless you are bound by a judgment or a settlement in a collective action, your individual claim under the ordinary law survives, and for a small sum it is usually the faster route. Check the other regimes in this result.

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"We can file your class-action claim for you — for a percentage"

high likelihood

A claims-filing service, a "settlement recovery" app or a law firm that is not class counsel contacts you offering to handle the claim, taking 15-40% of whatever arrives. Some buy the claim outright for a fraction of its value. Others harvest the personal data on the form.

What answers it

Filing is free, it is done on the administrator's own website, and it takes minutes. Class counsel are already paid out of the settlement — you do not retain anyone and you do not owe anyone a percentage. Several administrators now reject bulk third-party filings outright, and some settlement agreements void claims submitted by an aggregator, so using one can cost you the whole claim rather than a slice of it. The only address you should be entering your details into is the official settlement website named in the notice, which is also the only place that can tell you the real deadline.

"Up to $X" is read as an entitlement

high likelihood

The notice, the press coverage and the aggregators all quote the maximum per-claimant figure. It is read as an entitlement.

What answers it

"Up to" is a cap, not a promise. Almost every consumer settlement is a fixed fund divided among valid claims, so the per-claimant payment falls as the claims rate rises and is calculated only after the claims period closes, after the administrator validates claims, and after fees and costs come out. A settlement quoted at "up to $100" routinely pays single digits. That is not a reason to skip filing — the form is free and takes minutes — but it is a reason not to plan around the headline number.

Where to take it next

  1. Report it to Central Consumer Protection Authority / National Consumer HelplineCollective actions start as patterns in a regulator's or consumer body's complaint data. A single report is free, takes minutes, and is the only mechanism by which a case like yours becomes a case at all. It does not give you money and should not be mistaken for a claim.Regulatortypically 60 daysofficial page
  2. Run your own individual claim in parallelDo not wait for a collective action. They take years, most never certify, and the individual routes in this result run on their own limitation periods that keep expiring while you wait. If a collective action later covers the same loss you simply give credit for anything already recovered.Claim directtypically 30 days

The same claim type elsewhere

Class or group settlement — are you inside the class definition?GLOBALSupranational — party states varyFed. R. Civ. P. 23Confidence: highBelgium — action en réparation collective (Code de droit économique, Book XVII)BENational — BelgiumCode de droit économique / Wetboek van economisch recht, Livre XVII, Titre 2 (arts. XVII.35 et seq.)Confidence: lowEuropean Union — Representative Actions Directive (EU) 2020/1828EUSupranational — 27 countriesDirective (EU) 2020/1828 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumersConfidence: highFrance — action de groupeFRNational — FranceAction de groupe — Code de la consommation, arts. L623-1 et seq., as reformed in 2025Confidence: lowGermany — Abhilfeklage and Musterfeststellungsklage (VDuG)DENational — GermanyVerbraucherrechtedurchsetzungsgesetz (VDuG)Confidence: mediumItaly — azione di classe (arts. 840-bis et seq. c.p.c.)ITNational — ItalyCodice di procedura civile, arts. 840-bis to 840-sexiesdecies (Legge 12 aprile 2019, n. 31)Confidence: mediumNetherlands — WAMCA collective damages actionsNLNational — NetherlandsWet afwikkeling massaschade in collectieve actie (WAMCA)Confidence: mediumPoland — group proceedings (postępowanie grupowe)PLNational — PolandUstawa z dnia 17 grudnia 2009 r. o dochodzeniu roszczeń w postępowaniu grupowymConfidence: low

Other rights in the same countries

India — DGCA Civil Aviation Requirements, Section 3 Series M Part IVINNational — IndiaDGCA CAR Section 3, Series M, Part IV, Paras 1.2, 1.3 and 1.7Confidence: highIndia — India PostINNational — IndiaPost Office Act 2023 and the Department of Posts rules and compensation scheduleConfidence: lowIndia — IRCTC Ticket Deposit Receipt (TDR) refunds for cancelled and substantially delayed trainsINNational — IndiaRailway Passengers (Cancellation of Tickets and Refund of Fare) RulesConfidence: lowIndia — RBI e-mandate framework for recurring paymentsINNational — IndiaRBI circular DPSS.CO.PD.No.447/02.14.003/2019-20 (21 August 2019) — Processing of e-mandate on cards for recurring transactionsConfidence: mediumIndia — RBI limited liability for unauthorised electronic banking transactionsINNational — IndiaRBI/2017-18/15 — Customer Protection: Limiting Liability of Customers in Unauthorised Electronic Banking Transactions (6 July 2017)Confidence: highIndia — security deposit (Model Tenancy Act 2021 where adopted, otherwise State Rent Acts)INNational — IndiaModel Tenancy Act, 2021Confidence: lowIndia — the Clinical Establishments Act rate-display duty and the consumer forum routeINNational — IndiaClinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010Confidence: lowIndia — unclaimed deposits (RBI DEA Fund and UDGAM) and unpaid dividends and shares (IEPF)INNational — IndiaBanking Regulation Act 1949, s. 26AConfidence: medium

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Run your factsBack to the catalogue

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.