Skip to content
Coverage

Card and bank billing

Japan — Installment Sales Act connection of defences and Specified Commercial Transactions Act

NationalJPDerived or secondary source

Japan

Rule id
billing.jp-installment
Version
1.0.0
In force from
April 1, 1984
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Japan

In plain language

What this regime says.

In Japan, a credit card purchase of ¥40,000 or more lets you assert against the credit card company any objection you could raise against the shop — you file a written suspension-of-payment notice and collection stops while the dispute runs. There is no general cooling-off for ordinary online shopping, but the seller's published return policy is legally binding and an absent policy gives you eight days.

Who is covered

Consumers in Japan who paid by credit card issued through comprehensive credit purchase intermediation, for a cash price at or above the Cabinet Order floor.

What you get

Suspension of payment to the credit company while the dispute stands; return rights under the seller's published policy or the eight-day statutory default; rescission under the Consumer Contract Act where you were misled.

Where claims go wrong

  • Assuming Japan has a European-style cooling-off right for online purchases. It does not.
  • Not filing the written suspension-of-payment notice, which is what actually engages the credit company.
  • Not calling 188. Local consumer affairs centres mediate free and are remarkably effective.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. 割賦販売法 第30条の4 (Installment Sales Act, art. 30-4)Installment Sales Act (Act No. 159 of 1961), 割賦販売法art. 30-4 — the purchaser may assert against the comprehensive credit purchase intermediary any defence arising against the seller (抗弁の接続)
  2. 特定商取引法 (Act on Specified Commercial Transactions)Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (Act No. 57 of 1976)Cooling-off: 8 days for door-to-door and telemarketing sales, 20 days for multilevel and business-opportunity sales; art. 15-3 return rules for mail-order sales
  3. 消費者契約法 (Consumer Contract Act)Consumer Contract Act (Act No. 61 of 2000)arts. 4 and 8-10 — rescission for misrepresentation or improper solicitation, and voidness of clauses excluding liability or imposing excessive cancellation charges

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Mail-order return window (8 days where no policy was published)Where a mail-order or internet seller published no return policy, art. 15-3 of the Specified Commercial Transactions Act allows return within eight days of receipt. Where a policy was published, it governs — which is why the first step is to read the seller's statutory disclosure page.特定商取引法 (Act on Specified Commercial Transactions) — Cooling-off: 8 days for door-to-door and telemarketing sales, 20 days for multilevel and business-opportunity sales; art. 15-3 return rules for mail-order salesNotice period
  • Civil limitation (5 years from knowledge)Fatal if missedUnder the Civil Code as amended in 2020, a claim generally prescribes five years from when the creditor knew it could exercise the right, or ten years from when it became exercisable. Rescission for misrepresentation under the Consumer Contract Act has its own shorter periods — one year from when the misunderstanding was corrected, and five years from the contract.Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Hold the seller to its published return policyEvery Japanese distance seller must publish a 特定商取引法に基づく表記 disclosure setting out its return and refund policy. Under art. 15-3 that published policy binds the seller, and where none was published the consumer may return the goods within eight days of receipt. Screenshot the page before you complain — sellers edit them.Cooling-off: 8 days for door-to-door and telemarketing sales, 20 days for multilevel and business-opportunity sales; art. 15-3 return rules for mail-order sales

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"Take it up with the shop — we only lent you the money"

high likelihood

The credit company treats itself as a stranger to the sale.

What answers it

Article 30-4 exists precisely to defeat that answer. Where the purchase was financed through comprehensive credit purchase intermediation and the cash price meets the floor, you may assert against the credit company any ground of refusal you have against the seller. File the suspension notice in writing and ask them to identify the provision they rely on in refusing.

割賦販売法 第30条の4 (Installment Sales Act, art. 30-4) — art. 30-4 — the purchaser may assert against the comprehensive credit purchase intermediary any defence arising against the seller (抗弁の接続)

"There is no cooling-off for internet purchases"

high likelihood

The seller correctly notes that the Specified Commercial Transactions Act cooling-off does not cover mail order.

What answers it

That much is true, but art. 15-3 makes the seller's published return policy binding, and where none was published the consumer may return within eight days of receipt. Ask the seller to produce its 特定商取引法に基づく表記 disclosure. If it does not have one, that is itself a breach and the eight-day default applies.

特定商取引法 (Act on Specified Commercial Transactions) — Cooling-off: 8 days for door-to-door and telemarketing sales, 20 days for multilevel and business-opportunity sales; art. 15-3 return rules for mail-order sales

"You agreed to our cancellation charge"

medium likelihood

The seller enforces a large cancellation fee.

What answers it

Articles 8 to 10 of the Consumer Contract Act void clauses excluding a business's liability and clauses imposing cancellation charges exceeding the average damage a business of that kind would suffer. Ask the seller to justify the figure by reference to its actual average loss; most cannot.

消費者契約法 (Consumer Contract Act) — arts. 4 and 8-10 — rescission for misrepresentation or improper solicitation, and voidness of clauses excluding liability or imposing excessive cancellation charges

Where to take it next

  1. Written demand to the seller and suspension notice to the credit companyWrite to the seller setting out the defect or non-delivery. Separately, file a 支払停止の抗弁書 with the credit card company under art. 30-4 so that collection stops while the dispute runs.Claim directtypically 14 days
  2. 消費生活センター / National Consumer Affairs Center (消費者ホットライン 188)Dialling 188 routes you to your nearest local consumer affairs centre. They mediate free of charge, they know the Installment Sales Act forms, and a call from a centre changes how a seller responds. This is the single highest-value step for a Japanese consumer and it is badly under-used.Alternative dispute resolutiontypically 45 daysofficial page
  3. Designated dispute resolution body for the credit companyCredit card companies are required to be members of a designated dispute resolution organisation (指定紛争解決機関) under the Installment Sales Act. Ask which one, and file there if the credit company refuses to honour the suspension notice.Alternative dispute resolutiontypically 90 days
  4. 少額訴訟 (small claims) in the Summary CourtThe 少額訴訟 procedure handles money claims up to ¥600,000 in a single hearing, with a modest stamp fee and no need for a lawyer.Small claimstypically 90 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Card scheme chargeback rules (Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover)SCHEMESupranationalparty states varyVisa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service RulesConfidence: mediumPSD2 — unauthorised transactions and direct-debit refunds (Directive (EU) 2015/2366)EUSupranational30 countriesDirective (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)Confidence: highNorway — Financial Contracts Act 2020 and FinansklagenemndaNONationalNorwayLov om finansavtaler (finansavtaleloven), LOV-2020-12-18-146Confidence: mediumRussia — Federal Law 161-FZ on the National Payment System and the financial ombudsmanRUNationalRussiaФедеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», ст. 9Confidence: mediumSwitzerland — Financial Services Act ombudsman affiliation and the Swiss Banking OmbudsmanCHNationalSwitzerlandFinancial Services Act (FinSA / FIDLEG), SR 950.1Confidence: mediumTürkiye — Bank Cards and Credit Cards Law No. 5464 and the Consumer Arbitration CommitteesTRNationalTürkiyeBanka Kartları ve Kredi Kartları Kanunu No. 5464Confidence: mediumConsumer Credit Act 1974 s.75 (and s.75A) — creditor joint and several liabilityGBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Credit Act 1974, s.75Confidence: highCanada — payment card codes of conduct, provincial consumer protection and OBSICANationalCanadaCode of Conduct for the Payment Card Industry in CanadaConfidence: medium

Other rights in the same countries

Japan — Act on Specified Commercial Transactions and the final-confirmation-screen rulesJPNationalJapan特定商取引に関する法律 (Act on Specified Commercial Transactions), Act No. 57 of 1976Confidence: mediumJapan — dormant deposits (Act No. 101 of 2016, in force 1 January 2018)JPNationalJapanAct on Utilization of Funds Related to Dormant Deposits to Promote Public Interest Activities by the Private Sector (Act No. 101 of 2016)Confidence: mediumJapan — filed conditions of carriage, the Consumer Contract Act and the Montreal ConventionJPNationalJapan航空法 第106条 (Civil Aeronautics Act, Art. 106 — filed conditions of carriage)Confidence: mediumJapan — Japan PostJPNationalJapanPostal Act (Act No. 165 of 1947) and Japan Post's service termsConfidence: lowJapan — JR delay certificates (遅延証明書) and limited express-charge refundsJPNationalJapanCarriers’ published conditions of carriage (運送約款)Confidence: lowJapan — tax-inclusive price display and misleading representationsJPNationalJapanAct against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations (Act No. 134 of 1962), art. 5Confidence: mediumJapan — the national fee schedule and the high-cost medical expense benefitJPNationalJapanHealth Insurance Act (健康保険法) and the National Health Insurance Act (国民健康保険法)Confidence: lowJapan — two-stage collective consumer redressJPNationalJapanAct on Special Provisions of Civil Procedure for Collective Recovery of Property Damage Incurred by Consumers (Act No. 96 of 2013)Confidence: low

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.