Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Thailand — Civil Aviation Board Regulation No. 101 on passenger rights protection

NationalTHUnverified — check before relying on it

Thailand

Rule id
air.th-caat
Version
1.0.0
In force from
May 20, 2025
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Thailand

In plain language

What this regime says.

Thailand strengthened its air passenger rights with Civil Aviation Board Regulation No. 101, in force from 20 May 2025. It now covers international departures as well as domestic flights, pays cash compensation on longer delays, requires food and free communications from two hours, and gives real tarmac-delay rights including a right to disembark after three hours.

Who is covered

Passengers on domestic and international scheduled flights departing Thailand, and on Thai-licensed carriers.

What you get

Food, drink and free communications from two hours; tarmac-delay protections and a right to disembark after three hours without a confirmed departure; rerouting or a refund; and cash compensation on longer delays, whose amount we have not verified.

Where claims go wrong

  • Relying on guides written before 20 May 2025. The old notification covered domestic flights only and paid less.
  • Accepting a voucher worth less than the cash entitlement. Substitution requires equal or greater value.
  • Not asking the carrier in writing which band applies. That answer is the claim.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. ข้อบังคับของคณะกรรมการการบินพลเรือน ฉบับที่ 101 (Regulation of the Civil Aviation Board No. 101)Regulation of the Civil Aviation Board No. 101 on Measures to Protect the Rights of Passengers on Domestic and International Scheduled Flights, in force from 20 May 2025URL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Food, drink and free communications from two hoursFrom two hours of delay the carrier must provide food and beverages, or coupons for them, and free means of communication — telephone calls or email. This is not conditional on the cause.
  • Tarmac delay rights, including a right to get offWhile you are held on the aircraft the carrier must maintain adequate ventilation and temperature, keep lavatories available and provide urgent medical care if needed. Once a tarmac delay exceeds three hours with no confirmed departure time, you must be allowed to disembark unless doing so would create a safety or air traffic control problem. Ask the crew to record your request in the flight documentation.
  • A voucher only if it is worth at least as muchWhere the regulation provides compensation, a carrier may offer a credit shell, travel voucher or mileage instead — but only of equal or greater value. A voucher worth less than the cash figure does not discharge the obligation, and an expiring voucher is not equal value.
  • Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineWrite to the carrier naming Regulation of the Civil Aviation Board No. 101, the flight and the length of the delay, and ask it to state which compensation band applies and what it is paying. Its answer is evidence.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand (CAAT)CAAT enforces Regulation No. 101 and operates a passenger complaints channel. It is also the body that can tell you the correct figure for your band, which is the question we could not answer.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB)The OCPB handles consumer complaints generally and is the parallel route where the complaint is about the contract, the fare or misleading information rather than the flight itself.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  4. Consumer Case CourtBinding on themThailand runs a dedicated consumer procedure with no court fee for the consumer and a relaxed burden of proof. It is a realistic route for a disruption claim of any size.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.