Flight disruption
Hong Kong SAR — Civil Aviation Department, contract of carriage and the Carriage by Air Ordinance
NationalHKDerived or secondary source
Hong Kong SAR
- Rule id
- air.hk-cad
- Version
- 1.0.0
- In force from
- November 10, 2006
- Last read against its sources
- August 5, 2026
- Countries bound
- Hong Kong SAR China
In plain language
What this regime says.
Authority
Every citation,
with its pinpoint.
A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
- Carriage by Air Ordinance (Cap. 500) (Hong Kong)Carriage by Air Ordinance (Cap. 500), which gives effect in Hong Kong to the Montreal Convention 1999 and the Warsaw systemURL verified 2026-08-05
- Trade Descriptions Ordinance (Cap. 362) (Hong Kong)Trade Descriptions Ordinance (Cap. 362), as amended by the Trade Descriptions (Unfair Trade Practices) (Amendment) Ordinance 2012, prohibiting misleading omissions and unfair trade practices in the supply of servicesURL verified 2026-08-05
Sources
Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.
- Civil Aviation Department, Hong Kong SAR. The CAD regulates safety and licensing; Hong Kong has enacted no air passenger compensation scheme and the CAD administers none.Civil Aviation Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Regionretrieved 2026-08-05
- Consumer Council of Hong Kong — complaint and conciliation route for airline disputesConsumer Council, Hong Kong SARretrieved 2026-08-05
What it imposes
Clocks, defences and the ladder.
A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.
The clocks it starts
- Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period
What it entitles you to, beyond money
- The Small Claims Tribunal is fast, cheap and used for exactly thisThe Tribunal hears monetary claims up to HKD 75,000 with no legal representation and a filing fee of a few hundred dollars. Airline delay claims built on the conditions of carriage and receipted losses are a staple of its list, and the prospect of a hearing settles most of them.
- The Trade Descriptions Ordinance, where the conduct was misleadingThe 2012 amendments extended the Ordinance to services and prohibit misleading omissions and aggressive commercial practices. Selling a schedule the carrier had already decided not to operate, or representing a voucher as the only available remedy, is within its scope. The Customs and Excise Department enforces it.
- Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)
Where to take it next
- Written claim to the airlineWrite to the carrier citing the clause of its conditions of carriage that it did not honour and your itemised loss with receipts.Claim directtypically 30 days
- Consumer Council of Hong KongThe Council conciliates consumer complaints including against airlines and publishes case studies. It cannot order payment but carriers engage with it.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
- Small Claims TribunalBinding on themClaims up to HKD 75,000, no lawyers, low fee, quick listing. The most effective route in Hong Kong for a disruption claim.Small claimstypically 180 days
Documents
What this regime can produce.
Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.
The same claim type elsewhere
Belarus — Air Code of the Republic of Belarus and the Department of AviationBYNational — BelarusВоздушный кодекс Республики БеларусьConfidence: lowEU Regulation 261/2004 (air passenger rights)EUSupranational — 31 countriesRegulation (EC) No 261/2004Confidence: highGermany — contractual damages beyond the Article 7 sum (BGB)DENational — GermanyRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, Art. 12(1)Confidence: mediumItaly — ruined-holiday damages (danno da vacanza rovinata)ITNational — ItalyRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, Art. 12(1)Confidence: lowMoldova — air passenger rights under the EU–Moldova Common Aviation Area AgreementMDNational — MoldovaEU–Moldova Common Aviation Area Agreement, Annex IIIConfidence: mediumRussian Federation — Air Code Art. 120 (carrier liability for delay)RUNational — RussiaВоздушный кодекс Российской Федерации, ст. 120 (Ответственность перевозчика за просрочку доставки пассажира, багажа или груза)Confidence: highSpain — further damages beyond the Article 7 sumESNational — SpainRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, Art. 12(1)Confidence: lowTürkiye — SHY-YOLCU air passenger rights regulationTRNational — TürkiyeSHY-YOLCU, Kapsam (scope)Confidence: medium
Other rights in the same countries
Hong Kong — rental deposit (Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7), and Part IVA for regulated subdivided unit tenancies)HKNational — Hong Kong SAR ChinaLandlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7), and Part IVA for regulated subdivided unit tenanciesConfidence: lowHong Kong — dormant accounts and unclaimed money (no general escheat scheme)HKNational — Hong Kong SAR ChinaCompanies Ordinance (Cap. 622), Pt 15Confidence: lowHong Kong — HKMA Code of Banking Practice and the Financial Dispute Resolution CentreHKNational — Hong Kong SAR ChinaCode of Banking Practice (Hong Kong)Confidence: mediumHong Kong SAR — Hongkong PostHKNational — Hong Kong SAR ChinaPost Office Ordinance (Cap. 98) and the Postal Services (Compensation) rulesConfidence: low
Does this one reach your facts?
The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.
Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.