Flight disruption
China — 航班正常管理规定 (Flight Normality Management Provisions, CCAR-271)
China
- Rule id
- air.cn-ccar271
- Version
- 1.0.0
- In force from
- January 1, 2017
- Last read against its sources
- August 5, 2026
- Countries bound
- China
In plain language
What this regime says.
China has no national compensation tariff for flight delay. Instead the Flight Normality Management Provisions require every domestic carrier to publish its own compensation scheme and then hold it to it. The obligations that are national are the care rules — who pays for meals and a hotel depends on whether the delay was the carrier's fault — and the tarmac-delay rules.
Who is covered
Passengers on domestic flights operated by Chinese carriers, and for the service and information obligations, passengers at Chinese airports generally.
What you get
Meals and accommodation at the carrier's expense where the delay was its own fault, and assistance at your expense where it was not. Water and food after two hours on the tarmac, and the right to leave the aircraft after three. Whatever compensation the carrier's own published conditions of carriage promise. On international carriage, the Montreal Convention.
Where claims go wrong
- Looking for a national figure. There is not one — the figure is in the carrier's own published scheme.
- Not asking for the cause in writing. It decides who pays for the hotel.
- Reading only the English conditions of carriage. The Chinese text is the operative one.
- Complaining only to the airline. The CAAC Consumer Affairs Centre publishes complaint statistics by carrier, which is real leverage.
Authority
Every citation,
with its pinpoint.
- 航班正常管理规定(交通运输部令2016年第56号),第十七条航班正常管理规定 (Flight Normality Management Provisions), Ministry of Transport Decree No. 56 of 2016, promulgated 20 May 2016 and in force from 1 January 2017; the CAAC regulation coded CCAR-271URL verified 2026-08-05第十七条 (Art. 17 — carrier compensation schemes)
- 航班正常管理规定,第二十四条(机上延误)航班正常管理规定 (Flight Normality Management Provisions), Ministry of Transport Decree No. 56 of 2016URL verified 2026-08-05第二十四条 (tarmac delay)
- 公共航空运输旅客服务管理规定 (CCAR-273)公共航空运输旅客服务管理规定 (Provisions on the Administration of Passenger Services in Public Air Transport), CCAR-273, covering ticketing, refunds, carriage and baggageURL verified 2026-08-05
Sources
Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.
- Ministry of Transport Decree No. 56 of 2016, 航班正常管理规定, full text on the CAAC information-disclosure site. Art. 17 requires a domestic carrier to state in its general conditions of carriage whether it compensates for delay and, if so, the conditions, standards and methods, and to inform passengers at the point of sale.中国民用航空局 (Civil Aviation Administration of China)retrieved 2026-08-05
- CAAC interpretation of the Flight Normality Management Provisions, confirming that carriers determine for themselves whether and how much to compensate for delay, which is presented as a market-based design rather than an omission中国民用航空局 (Civil Aviation Administration of China)retrieved 2026-08-05
What it imposes
Clocks, defences and the ladder.
The clocks it starts
- Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period
What it entitles you to, beyond money
- Who pays for meals and a hotel depends on the cause, and the rule is explicitThis is the provision worth knowing. Where the delay or cancellation at the departure airport is due to the carrier — maintenance, crew, aircraft scheduling, its own operational decisions — the carrier must provide meals and accommodation itself, free of charge. Where it is due to weather, an emergency, air traffic control, security screening or the passengers, the carrier must help you arrange meals and accommodation but you bear the cost. So the first question in a Chinese delay is not "how much" but "what caused it", and the answer determines who pays. Make the carrier state the cause: it is required to inform passengers of the reason.
- Tarmac delay: water and food at two hours, off the aircraft at threeWhile you are held on board, the carrier must provide drinking water and food once the on-board delay reaches two hours. Once it reaches three hours with no confirmed departure time, the carrier must arrange for passengers to disembark and wait in the terminal, unless that would breach aviation safety or security requirements. Ask the crew to record your request.
- The carrier's own published scheme is binding on itArt. 17 turns a marketing document into an enforceable one. If the carrier's general conditions of carriage promise compensation for a delay attributable to it, that promise is the entitlement, and the CAAC can act on a failure to honour it. Download the conditions from the carrier's Chinese-language site — the English version is sometimes an abridgement — and quote the clause number.
- You are entitled to be told what is happening, and whenThe Provisions impose specific information obligations on carriers and airports: the reason for the delay and updates at defined intervals. A carrier that leaves a gate unattended for three hours is in breach of a regulatory obligation independently of anything it owes you in money, and that breach is what a CAAC complaint bites on.
- Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)
Where to take it next
- Written claim to the airlineClaim in writing to the carrier, quoting the clause of its own general conditions of carriage that provides for delay compensation and the reason it gave for the delay. Under the Provisions it must handle the complaint and respond within a set period.Claim directtypically 30 days
- 民航局消费者事务中心 (CAAC Consumer Affairs Centre)The CAAC runs a national consumer affairs centre for air passengers, reachable on 12326 and through its online portal. It is the escalation point once the carrier has had its opportunity, and it publishes complaint statistics by carrier, which is why carriers respond to it.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
- People's Court claimBinding on themChinese courts hear passenger claims against carriers, and the small-claims procedure is available for modest sums. The Consumer Rights Protection Law applies to carriage and supports a claim where the carrier misrepresented what it would do.Small claimstypically 180 days
Documents
What this regime can produce.
The same claim type elsewhere
Other rights in the same countries
Does this one reach your facts?
The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.
Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.