Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

China — 航班正常管理规定 (Flight Normality Management Provisions, CCAR-271)

NationalCNDerived or secondary source

China

Rule id
air.cn-ccar271
Version
1.0.0
In force from
January 1, 2017
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
China

In plain language

What this regime says.

China has no national compensation tariff for flight delay. Instead the Flight Normality Management Provisions require every domestic carrier to publish its own compensation scheme and then hold it to it. The obligations that are national are the care rules — who pays for meals and a hotel depends on whether the delay was the carrier's fault — and the tarmac-delay rules.

Who is covered

Passengers on domestic flights operated by Chinese carriers, and for the service and information obligations, passengers at Chinese airports generally.

What you get

Meals and accommodation at the carrier's expense where the delay was its own fault, and assistance at your expense where it was not. Water and food after two hours on the tarmac, and the right to leave the aircraft after three. Whatever compensation the carrier's own published conditions of carriage promise. On international carriage, the Montreal Convention.

Where claims go wrong

  • Looking for a national figure. There is not one — the figure is in the carrier's own published scheme.
  • Not asking for the cause in writing. It decides who pays for the hotel.
  • Reading only the English conditions of carriage. The Chinese text is the operative one.
  • Complaining only to the airline. The CAAC Consumer Affairs Centre publishes complaint statistics by carrier, which is real leverage.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. 航班正常管理规定(交通运输部令2016年第56号),第十七条航班正常管理规定 (Flight Normality Management Provisions), Ministry of Transport Decree No. 56 of 2016, promulgated 20 May 2016 and in force from 1 January 2017; the CAAC regulation coded CCAR-271URL verified 2026-08-05第十七条 (Art. 17 — carrier compensation schemes)
  2. 航班正常管理规定,第二十四条(机上延误)航班正常管理规定 (Flight Normality Management Provisions), Ministry of Transport Decree No. 56 of 2016URL verified 2026-08-05第二十四条 (tarmac delay)
  3. 公共航空运输旅客服务管理规定 (CCAR-273)公共航空运输旅客服务管理规定 (Provisions on the Administration of Passenger Services in Public Air Transport), CCAR-273, covering ticketing, refunds, carriage and baggageURL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Who pays for meals and a hotel depends on the cause, and the rule is explicitThis is the provision worth knowing. Where the delay or cancellation at the departure airport is due to the carrier — maintenance, crew, aircraft scheduling, its own operational decisions — the carrier must provide meals and accommodation itself, free of charge. Where it is due to weather, an emergency, air traffic control, security screening or the passengers, the carrier must help you arrange meals and accommodation but you bear the cost. So the first question in a Chinese delay is not "how much" but "what caused it", and the answer determines who pays. Make the carrier state the cause: it is required to inform passengers of the reason.
  • Tarmac delay: water and food at two hours, off the aircraft at threeWhile you are held on board, the carrier must provide drinking water and food once the on-board delay reaches two hours. Once it reaches three hours with no confirmed departure time, the carrier must arrange for passengers to disembark and wait in the terminal, unless that would breach aviation safety or security requirements. Ask the crew to record your request.
  • The carrier's own published scheme is binding on itArt. 17 turns a marketing document into an enforceable one. If the carrier's general conditions of carriage promise compensation for a delay attributable to it, that promise is the entitlement, and the CAAC can act on a failure to honour it. Download the conditions from the carrier's Chinese-language site — the English version is sometimes an abridgement — and quote the clause number.
  • You are entitled to be told what is happening, and whenThe Provisions impose specific information obligations on carriers and airports: the reason for the delay and updates at defined intervals. A carrier that leaves a gate unattended for three hours is in breach of a regulatory obligation independently of anything it owes you in money, and that breach is what a CAAC complaint bites on.
  • Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineClaim in writing to the carrier, quoting the clause of its own general conditions of carriage that provides for delay compensation and the reason it gave for the delay. Under the Provisions it must handle the complaint and respond within a set period.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. 民航局消费者事务中心 (CAAC Consumer Affairs Centre)The CAAC runs a national consumer affairs centre for air passengers, reachable on 12326 and through its online portal. It is the escalation point once the carrier has had its opportunity, and it publishes complaint statistics by carrier, which is why carriers respond to it.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. People's Court claimBinding on themChinese courts hear passenger claims against carriers, and the small-claims procedure is available for modest sums. The Consumer Rights Protection Law applies to carriage and supports a claim where the carrier misrepresented what it would do.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

China — rental deposit (中华人民共和国民法典 (Civil Code of the PRC), Book Three, Chapter 14 (lease contracts), together with the municipal housing rental regulations of the city where the property is)CNNationalChina中华人民共和国民法典 (Civil Code of the PRC), Book Three, Chapter 14 (lease contracts), together with the municipal housing rental regulations of the city where the property isConfidence: lowChina — E-Commerce Law and the 2024 Consumer Rights Protection Law Implementing RegulationsCNNationalChina中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法实施条例 (Regulations for the Implementation of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests), State Council Decree No. 778Confidence: mediumChina — payment services supervision and UnionPay card dispute rulesCNNationalChina非银行支付机构监督管理条例 (Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Non-bank Payment Institutions), State Council Decree No. 768Confidence: lowChina — Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)CNNationalChina中华人民共和国个人信息保护法 (Personal Information Protection Law), Arts. 44–50, 69Confidence: mediumPeople's Republic of China — China PostCNNationalChina中华人民共和国邮政法 (Postal Law of the People's Republic of China)Confidence: lowPeople's Republic of China — China Railway refund and change rules (铁路旅客运输规程)CNNationalChina铁路旅客运输规程 (Regulations on Railway Passenger Transport) and the Railway Law of the PRCConfidence: low

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.