Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Vietnam — non-refundable advance compensation for delayed and cancelled flights

NationalVNUnverified — check before relying on it

Viet Nam

Rule id
air.vn-caav
Version
1.0.0
In force from
July 1, 2026
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Vietnam

In plain language

What this regime says.

Vietnam requires carriers to pay a fixed "non-refundable advance compensation" per passenger, banded by route distance, when a flight is cancelled or delayed at length or a passenger is not carried through the carrier's fault — with no proof of loss required, and on top of any refund. The schedule was replaced on 1 July 2026 by Circular 48/2026/TT-BXD.

Who is covered

Passengers with a confirmed reservation and a ticket on flights departing Vietnam and on Vietnamese carriers.

What you get

A fixed sum per passenger by distance band, in dong domestically and US dollars internationally, plus a refund of the fare with deadlines fixed by payment method. We are not stating the amount because the schedule changed in July 2026 and we could not read the new one.

Where claims go wrong

  • Accepting the refund as the whole answer. The advance compensation is separate and cumulative.
  • Being told you must prove a loss. You must not: that is the point of an advance, non-refundable payment.
  • Using a figure from a pre-July-2026 guide. The schedule changed.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Thông tư số 48/2026/TT-BXDCircular No. 48/2026/TT-BXD of the Ministry of Construction of 30 June 2026 on air transport, in force from 1 July 2026, setting the levels of non-refundable advance compensation ("bồi thường ứng trước không hoàn lại") payable to passengers on delayed, cancelled or denied-boarding flightsURL verified 2026-08-05
  2. Luật Hàng không dân dụng Việt NamLaw on Vietnam Civil Aviation No. 66/2006/QH11, as amended by Law No. 61/2014/QH13 — the enabling statute for the advance-compensation regimeURL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • The advance compensation is on top of the refundTwo separate obligations. If the flight did not operate, the fare comes back; the advance compensation is paid because you were disrupted. A carrier that returns the fare and stops has done half of what it owes.
  • Refund deadlines fixed by payment methodThe 2026 circular sets explicit refund deadlines that depend on how you paid — the first time Vietnamese law has done so. If the carrier is slow, ask it to state the deadline applicable to your payment method under the circular; that question usually produces the refund.
  • You do not have to prove any lossThis is what "ứng trước không hoàn lại" means: paid in advance, non-refundable, no proof of loss. You are not required to show receipts, a missed meeting or a wasted hotel night to receive it. Anything the disruption actually cost you is a separate claim.
  • Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineWrite to the carrier asking for the non-refundable advance compensation under Circular 48/2026/TT-BXD, naming the flight and the length of the delay, and asking it to state the distance band and the figure. Ask separately for the refund and for its statutory deadline.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Civil Aviation Authority of Vietnam (Cục Hàng không Việt Nam)The CAAV supervises carriers and enforces the advance-compensation regime. It is also the body that can tell you the correct figure for your band.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. People's Court claimBinding on themAvailable where the carrier refuses. Vietnamese consumer protection law supports the claim and the sums are small enough for a simplified procedure.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.