Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Uzbekistan — Air Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Civil Aviation Agency

NationalUZUnverified — check before relying on it

Uzbekistan

Rule id
air.uz-caa
Version
1.0.0
In force from
May 7, 1993
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Uzbekistan

In plain language

What this regime says.

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Воздушный кодекс Республики УзбекистанAir Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Law No. 861-XII of 7 May 1993, as amended)URL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Warsaw Convention claim (Art. 29)Art. 29 extinguishes the right to damages if an action is not brought within two years of arrival, of the date the aircraft ought to have arrived, or of the date carriage stopped. Courts treat it as extinguishing the right rather than barring the remedy, so unlike an ordinary limitation period it is not suspended by correspondence and cannot be waived by the carrier.Warsaw Convention 1929, Art. 29 — Art. 29Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Uzbekistan is in the Warsaw system, not the Montreal ConventionThis changes the arithmetic on an international flight and almost nobody checks it. Uzbekistan is not a party to the Montreal Convention 1999, so carriage with a place of departure or destination in Uzbekistan falls outside it and into the older Warsaw system, where the liability limits are markedly lower and the written-notice periods for baggage are shorter — three days for damage and fourteen for delay under the unamended Convention, rather than seven and twenty-one. Do not assume the Montreal figures apply and do not miss the shorter notice period.
  • Warsaw Convention damages for delay (international carriage)Art. 19 of the Warsaw Convention makes the carrier liable for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of passengers and baggage, and Art. 20 gives it a defence where it proves it took all necessary measures to avoid the damage or that it was impossible to take them. Like the Montreal claim it pays the loss the delay actually caused you rather than a fixed sum, so it lives on receipts. The ceiling depends on which Warsaw-system instrument the two States have in common — the 1929 Convention, the Hague Protocol of 1955, or the Montreal Additional Protocols of 1975 — and the figures differ between them, so we state none. The action is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 29, and that period is a hard extinction rather than an ordinary limitation.Art. 19, Art. 20

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineWritten claim to the carrier, quoting the flight and the delay, with proof of sending.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Civil Aviation Agency of UzbekistanThe Agency regulates carriers operating to, from and within Uzbekistan and receives passenger complaints.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Civil court claimBinding on themConsumer claims in Uzbekistan are heard by the civil courts and attract reduced fees.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.