Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Qatar — Civil Aviation Authority passenger rights framework

NationalQAUnverified — check before relying on it

Qatar

Rule id
air.qa-qcaa
Version
1.0.0
In force from
January 1, 2015
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Qatar

In plain language

What this regime says.

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Civil Aviation Law of the State of Qatar and the QCAA regulationsLaw No. 15 of 2002 on Civil Aviation of the State of Qatar and the regulations made under it by the Qatar Civil Aviation AuthorityURL verified 2026-08-05
  2. Law No. 8 of 2008 on Consumer Protection (Qatar)Law No. 8 of 2008 on Consumer Protection (State of Qatar)URL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Check whether a stronger regime reaches your flight before you use this oneGulf carriers fly enormous long-haul networks, and the regime that pays is very often not the one where the airline is based. A flight departing an EU or UK airport engages Regulation 261/2004 or its UK equivalent against any carrier, including Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad, and pays EUR or GBP 250 to 600. A flight departing Brazil engages ANAC Resolution 400. A flight into the United States engages the DOT rules on denied boarding and refunds. The local Gulf complaints route is worth using when nothing else reaches the flight, and it is the wrong first choice when something does. Work out which regimes touch your itinerary before you spend a month on the weakest one.
  • Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineComplain to the carrier in writing, quoting its own conditions of carriage on delay and cancellation and your itemised loss.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Qatar Civil Aviation AuthorityThe QCAA takes passenger complaints about carriers operating to, from and within Qatar.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Ministry of Commerce and Industry — Consumer Protection DepartmentThe consumer protection route under Law No. 8 of 2008, for a service supplied in Qatar.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  4. Civil court claimBinding on themAvailable where the carrier refuses and the loss justifies it.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.