Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Peru — Ley de Aeronáutica Civil and INDECOPI

NationalPEUnverified — check before relying on it

Peru

Rule id
air.pe-27261
Version
0.1.0
In force from
August 5, 2026
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Peru

In plain language

What this regime says.

Peru’s air passenger protection runs mainly through the consumer code, Ley 29571, enforced by INDECOPI, with the Ley de Aeronáutica Civil regulating the carriers themselves. INDECOPI can sanction an airline and order corrective measures in the passenger’s favour, which makes it a more useful body than most aviation regulators in the region.

Who is covered

Passengers on air services operating to, from and within Peru.

What you get

Assistance during significant delays, rerouting or reimbursement, a regulated response to a complaints-book entry, and INDECOPI’s power to order corrective measures.

Where claims go wrong

  • Skipping the Libro de Reclamaciones. It starts the regulated response clock and is the record INDECOPI works from.
  • Complaining only to the DGAC. INDECOPI is the body that can order redress to you.
  • Letting the Montreal Convention two-year bar run on an international flight.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Ley 27261 (Ley de Aeronáutica Civil del Perú)Ley 27261 — Ley de Aeronáutica Civil del PerúURL verified 2026-08-05
  2. Ley 29571 (Código de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor)Ley 29571 — Código de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor (Perú)URL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Montreal Convention two-year bar (international carriage)Fatal if missedThis is international carriage between States Parties, so Art. 35 of the Montreal Convention extinguishes the right to damages two years after arrival, the date the aircraft ought to have arrived, or the date carriage stopped. It is a hard cut-off. Local consumer legislation may give a longer period for some heads of claim, but do not rely on it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35 — Art. 35Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Care while you wait, and rerouting or a refundPeru's regime obliges the carrier to look after you during a significant delay — food, drink, a means of communication, and accommodation where the wait runs overnight — and to offer either carriage on the next available service or the return of your money. Ask for it at the airport, in writing if you can, and keep receipts for anything you have to buy yourself. Those receipts are recoverable under general consumer law even where a specific aviation figure is unclear.
  • A written statement of the reasonAsk the carrier, in writing, for the reason for the disruption and for the compensation figure it says applies under the national regime. Whatever the answer, you now have it in writing, which is what every later step needs.

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"There is no compensation scheme here"

medium likelihood

The carrier says the country has no passenger-rights regime, or that its conditions of carriage are the only thing that applies.

What answers it

That is not right: Ley 27261 (Ley de Aeronáutica Civil del Perú) and Ley 29571 (Código de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor) govern this. Ask the carrier to state, in writing, which provision it says applies to your flight and what it provides. A carrier that will not answer that question in writing is one you take to the regulator.

Ley 27261 (Ley de Aeronáutica Civil del Perú)

"Only the Montreal Convention applies"

medium likelihood

On an international flight the carrier says the Montreal Convention is the exclusive source of its liability, so no national consumer remedy is available.

What answers it

The Convention governs claims for damage — death, injury, baggage, and damage occasioned by delay — and it is exclusive for those. It does not displace a national regulator’s power to require assistance, rerouting or a refund, which are regulatory obligations rather than claims in damages. Plead them separately.

Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35 — Art. 35

Where to take it next

  1. Libro de ReclamacionesEvery supplier in Peru must keep a complaints book, physical or virtual, and must respond within the regulated period. Use it at the airport if you can; it is the cleanest way to fix the date and the facts.Claim directtypically 15 days
  2. INDECOPIBinding on themINDECOPI enforces the consumer code against airlines, can impose sanctions and can order corrective measures in the consumer’s favour — which is more than most aviation regulators in this region can do.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. DGAC — Ministerio de Transportes y ComunicacionesThe civil aviation directorate supervises carriers under the Ley de Aeronáutica Civil. Use it for regulatory breaches; use INDECOPI for redress.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.