Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Myanmar — Department of Civil Aviation

NationalMMUnverified — check before relying on it

Myanmar

Rule id
air.mm-dca
Version
1.0.0
In force from
January 1, 2016
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Myanmar (Burma)

In plain language

What this regime says.

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Myanmar Aircraft Act and the Myanmar Civil Aviation RequirementsThe Myanmar Aircraft Act and the Myanmar Civil Aviation Requirements issued by the Department of Civil AviationURL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Warsaw Convention claim (Art. 29)Art. 29 extinguishes the right to damages if an action is not brought within two years of arrival, of the date the aircraft ought to have arrived, or of the date carriage stopped. Courts treat it as extinguishing the right rather than barring the remedy, so unlike an ordinary limitation period it is not suspended by correspondence and cannot be waived by the carrier.Warsaw Convention 1929, Art. 29 — Art. 29Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Myanmar is in the Warsaw system, not the Montreal ConventionMyanmar is not a party to the Montreal Convention 1999. International carriage touching Myanmar is governed by the older Warsaw system, with lower liability limits and shorter written-notice periods for baggage claims. Check which treaty your ticket is subject to before relying on any Montreal figure.
  • Warsaw Convention damages for delay (international carriage)Art. 19 of the Warsaw Convention makes the carrier liable for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of passengers and baggage, and Art. 20 gives it a defence where it proves it took all necessary measures to avoid the damage or that it was impossible to take them. Like the Montreal claim it pays the loss the delay actually caused you rather than a fixed sum, so it lives on receipts. The ceiling depends on which Warsaw-system instrument the two States have in common — the 1929 Convention, the Hague Protocol of 1955, or the Montreal Additional Protocols of 1975 — and the figures differ between them, so we state none. The action is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 29, and that period is a hard extinction rather than an ordinary limitation.Art. 19, Art. 20

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineWrite to the carrier with the flight, the disruption and the itemised loss.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Department of Civil Aviation, MyanmarThe Department regulates carriers operating to, from and within Myanmar.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Civil court claimBinding on themAvailable in principle where the carrier refuses.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.