Skip to content
Coverage

Flight disruption

Morocco — Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile and Law 31-08 on consumer protection

NationalMAUnverified — check before relying on it

Morocco

Rule id
air.ma-dgac
Version
1.0.0
In force from
April 7, 2011
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Morocco

In plain language

What this regime says.

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Loi n° 31-08 édictant des mesures de protection du consommateur (Maroc)Loi n° 31-08 édictant des mesures de protection du consommateur, promulguée par le dahir n° 1-11-03 du 18 février 2011 (Kingdom of Morocco)URL verified 2026-08-05
  2. Code de l'aviation civile marocaine and the DGAC regulationsThe Moroccan civil aviation code and the regulations of the Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile, Ministère du Transport et de la LogistiqueURL verified 2026-08-05
  3. Decision Relating to the Implementation of the Yamoussoukro Declaration Concerning the Liberalisation of Access to Air Transport Markets in Africa (Yamoussoukro Decision)Yamoussoukro Decision, adopted 14 November 1999 and endorsed by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organisation of African Unity in July 2000; implemented through the Single African Air Transport Market (SAATM) launched by the African Union in January 2018, with the African Civil Aviation Commission as executing agencyURL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • Ask whether the African Union consumer regulation has been domesticatedThe Yamoussoukro Decision is implemented through a set of regulations that includes one on the protection of consumers of air transport services, administered through the African Civil Aviation Commission. Whether it gives you an enforceable right depends on whether your state has brought it into domestic law, which varies across the continent and which we have not verified state by state. It is worth one line in your complaint to the national authority: ask whether the African Union consumer protection regulation applies to your flight and, if so, what it provides. The answer is either a right you did not know you had or a clear statement that the national regulation is the only one in play.
  • Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)

Where to take it next

  1. Written claim to the airlineComplain to the carrier in writing first, naming the flight, the disruption and the loss it caused, and asking which provision of the national civil aviation regulations it says applies. The regulator will ask whether you did this and the carrier's written answer is your evidence.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC)The DGAC within the Ministry of Transport and Logistics regulates carriers operating to, from and within Morocco. Note that ONDA operates the airports and is not the body to complain to about a carrier.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  3. Civil or small claims courtBinding on themAvailable where the carrier refuses. Proportionate where several passengers on the same booking claim together, or where the disruption caused substantial out-of-pocket loss you can document.Small claimstypically 180 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.