Flight disruption
Fiji — Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji and the Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission
NationalFJUnverified — check before relying on it
Fiji
- Rule id
- air.fj-caaf
- Version
- 1.0.0
- In force from
- January 1, 2010
- Last read against its sources
- August 5, 2026
- Countries bound
- Fiji
In plain language
What this regime says.
Authority
Every citation,
with its pinpoint.
A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
- Civil Aviation Act 1976 (Fiji) and the Air Navigation RegulationsThe Civil Aviation Act and the Air Navigation Regulations of the Republic of Fiji, administered by the Civil Aviation Authority of FijiURL verified 2026-08-05
- Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission Act 2010Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission Act 2010, which prohibits misleading conduct and unfair practices in the supply of services and gives the Commission investigative and enforcement powersURL verified 2026-08-05
Sources
Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.
- Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji — the aviation regulatorCivil Aviation Authority of Fijiretrieved 2026-08-05
- Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission — the consumer regulator, which takes complaints about airlines and has acted against carriers over refunds and misleading conductFijian Competition and Consumer Commissionretrieved 2026-08-05
What it imposes
Clocks, defences and the ladder.
A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.
The clocks it starts
- Two years for a Montreal Convention claim (Art. 35)This is the limitation period for the Convention claim for proven delay damages on international carriage, not for any national compensation scheme, which may have its own. It is fatal to the Convention claim specifically, and correspondence does not suspend it.Montreal Convention 1999, Art. 35(1) — Art. 35(1)Limitation period
What it entitles you to, beyond money
- Check the regime at the other end of the ticket firstLong-haul Pacific itineraries almost always touch a jurisdiction with a real tariff. A flight departing Australia engages the Australian Consumer Law; one departing New Zealand engages the Civil Aviation Act 2023 delay provisions, which are unusually generous; one departing an EU or UK airport engages Regulation 261/2004 or its UK equivalent against any carrier. Where a small-island regime has nothing to offer, the leg that departed Sydney, Auckland or London very often does.
- Montreal Convention damages for delay (international carriage)On international carriage between States Parties, Art. 19 of the Montreal Convention makes the carrier liable for the damage the delay actually caused you — the unused hotel night, the missed onward booking, the extra meals and transport — unless it proves it took all measures that could reasonably be required. It is capped at 6,303 SDR per passenger (the figure ICAO set with effect from 28 December 2024) and it requires receipts, not a formula. This claim exists independently of any national scheme, and airlines never mention it. The right is extinguished two years after arrival under Art. 35.Art. 19, Art. 22(1)
Where to take it next
- Written claim to the airlineComplain to the carrier in writing with the flight, the disruption and your itemised loss, and ask which provision of its conditions of carriage or the national regulations it says applies.Claim directtypically 30 days
- Fijian Competition and Consumer Commission (FCCC)The FCCC is the route with teeth in Fiji. It enforces the consumer provisions of the 2010 Act against service providers including airlines, investigates complaints, and has acted over refunds and misleading conduct. Complain here rather than to the aviation regulator if what you want is money.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
- Civil Aviation Authority of FijiCAAF regulates safety and licensing for carriers operating to, from and within Fiji. It does not administer a compensation scheme.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
- Small claims or magistrates' courtBinding on themAvailable where the carrier refuses. Most Pacific jurisdictions run a small-claims process suitable for a disruption claim built on receipts.Small claimstypically 180 days
Documents
What this regime can produce.
Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.
The same claim type elsewhere
Belarus — Air Code of the Republic of Belarus and the Department of AviationBYNational — BelarusВоздушный кодекс Республики БеларусьConfidence: lowEU Regulation 261/2004 (air passenger rights)EUSupranational — 31 countriesRegulation (EC) No 261/2004Confidence: highGermany — contractual damages beyond the Article 7 sum (BGB)DENational — GermanyRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, Art. 12(1)Confidence: mediumItaly — ruined-holiday damages (danno da vacanza rovinata)ITNational — ItalyRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, Art. 12(1)Confidence: lowMoldova — air passenger rights under the EU–Moldova Common Aviation Area AgreementMDNational — MoldovaEU–Moldova Common Aviation Area Agreement, Annex IIIConfidence: mediumRussian Federation — Air Code Art. 120 (carrier liability for delay)RUNational — RussiaВоздушный кодекс Российской Федерации, ст. 120 (Ответственность перевозчика за просрочку доставки пассажира, багажа или груза)Confidence: highSpain — further damages beyond the Article 7 sumESNational — SpainRegulation (EC) No 261/2004, Art. 12(1)Confidence: lowTürkiye — SHY-YOLCU air passenger rights regulationTRNational — TürkiyeSHY-YOLCU, Kapsam (scope)Confidence: medium
Does this one reach your facts?
The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.
Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.