Skip to content
Coverage

Rail delay

Indonesia — KAI passenger service standards under the Ministry of Transport minimum service standards

NationalIDUnverified — check before relying on it

Indonesia

Rule id
rail.id
Version
1.0.0
In force from
August 1, 2019
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
Indonesia

In plain language

What this regime says.

Indonesia has no regime of the European kind that this product can quantify. This module names KAI passenger service standards under the Ministry of Transport minimum service standards, names the Directorate General of Railways (Ministry of Transportation) and the BPSK consumer dispute bodies, and lists exactly which figures to go and check — because a passenger sent to argue for a threshold we guessed is worse off than one told where to look.

Who is covered

Rail passengers on services in Indonesia.

What you get

The service obligations prescribed by the minimum service standards regulation, including a refund entitlement at longer delays. We are not stating the thresholds.

Where claims go wrong

  • Asking for "compensation" instead of citing the minimum service standards, which is where the entitlement lives.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Minister of Transportation Regulation on minimum service standards for railway passenger transport, and Law No. 23 of 2007 on RailwaysMinister of Transportation Regulation on minimum service standards for railway passenger transport, and Law No. 23 of 2007 on RailwaysURL verified 2026-08-05

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • A claim under KAI passenger service standards under the Ministry of Transport minimum service standardsYou have a route. We are not stating what it pays, because we have not verified this network’s figures.

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"The delay was caused by Network Rail / the infrastructure manager / a third party"

high likelihood

The operator points at signalling failure, a broken-down freight train, trespass or someone else’s infrastructure and says the delay was not their doing.

What answers it

Under the contractual UK Delay Repay schemes, cause is irrelevant to your entitlement: the schemes pay on the delay, whoever caused it, and the operator recovers internally from the infrastructure manager. Under Regulation (EU) 2021/782 the railway undertaking is the passenger’s counterparty and only a genuinely exceptional, unavoidable circumstance excuses it — and a staff strike at the railway itself is expressly not one.

"Here is a voucher"

high likelihood

The operator settles in rail travel vouchers or credit rather than money, often at a discount to what is owed.

What answers it

You are entitled to be paid in money. UK operators must offer at least one monetary method — bank transfer, cheque or refund to the original card — and Regulation (EU) 2021/782 allows vouchers only where the passenger accepts them, meaning you can simply decline and ask for cash. A voucher is worth less than its face value to you and more than its face value to them, which is why it is offered first.

"Your season ticket already accounts for delays"

medium likelihood

The operator suggests that a discounted season or an annual "performance" adjustment already compensates the holder, so individual claims are not payable.

What answers it

A season ticket does not waive compensation for individual delayed journeys. The schemes set out a pro-rata method for valuing one journey out of a season, precisely so that season holders can claim per delay. Ask them to apply it and to show the calculation.

Where to take it next

  1. Claim under KAI passenger service standards under the Ministry of Transport minimum service standardsClaim directly with the operator, quoting the service, the booked and actual arrival times and your ticket reference. Keep the ticket and the booking confirmation.Claim directofficial page
  2. Ask for a written decision with reasonsIf the claim is refused, ask for the decision in writing with the reason and the delay figure the operator is working from. Regulators and ombudsmen will not act without it, and operators sometimes reverse the decision rather than write it down.Internal appeal
  3. Complain to the Directorate General of Railways (Ministry of Transportation) and the BPSK consumer dispute bodiesthe Directorate General of Railways (Ministry of Transportation) and the BPSK consumer dispute bodies handles passenger complaints about rail services in this country.Regulatorofficial page

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.