Coverage in
Canada
24 regimes in the engine reach Canada, across 12 of the 13 claim families it models.
- Regimes reaching Canada
- 24
- Claim families covered
- 12 / 13
- Entries read off primary lawThe rest are derived from an official page, or unverified and stated without a figure.
- 1 / 24
- Sub-national legal systems carriedDeposit and billing law is frequently state or provincial law, so a national figure alone would flatter the coverage here.
- 13
What reaches you
Every regime in Canada.
Flight disruption1
Rental deposit9
Alberta — residential security deposit (Residential Tenancies Act, SA 2004, c R-17.1)CA-ABSub-national — CanadaResidential Tenancies Act, SA 2004, c R-17.1Confidence: lowBritish Columbia — residential security deposit (Residential Tenancy Act, SBC 2002, c 78)CA-BCSub-national — CanadaResidential Tenancy Act, SBC 2002, c 78Confidence: lowManitoba — residential security deposit (The Residential Tenancies Act, CCSM c R119)CA-MBSub-national — CanadaThe Residential Tenancies Act, CCSM c R119Confidence: lowNew Brunswick — residential security deposit (Residential Tenancies Act, SNB 1975, c R-10.2)CA-NBSub-national — CanadaResidential Tenancies Act, SNB 1975, c R-10.2Confidence: lowNova Scotia — residential security deposit (Residential Tenancies Act, RSNS 1989, c 401)CA-NSSub-national — CanadaResidential Tenancies Act, RSNS 1989, c 401Confidence: lowOntario — residential security deposit (Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, SO 2006, c 17)CA-ONSub-national — CanadaResidential Tenancies Act, 2006, SO 2006, c 17Confidence: lowPrince Edward Island — residential security deposit (Residential Tenancy Act, RSPEI 1988, c R-13.11)CA-PESub-national — CanadaResidential Tenancy Act, RSPEI 1988, c R-13.11Confidence: lowQuebec — residential security deposit (Civil Code of Québec, art. 1904)CA-QCSub-national — CanadaCivil Code of Québec, art. 1904Confidence: lowSaskatchewan — residential security deposit (The Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, SS 2006, c R-22.0001)CA-SKSub-national — CanadaThe Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, SS 2006, c R-22.0001Confidence: low
Unclaimed property4
Canada — unclaimed bank balances held by the Bank of Canada (Bank Act ss. 438–440)CANational — CanadaBank Act (S.C. 1991, c. 46), ss. 438–440Confidence: mediumAlberta — unclaimed property (Unclaimed Personal Property and Vested Property Act)CA-ABSub-national — CanadaUnclaimed Personal Property and Vested Property Act, SA 2007, c. U-1.5Confidence: mediumBritish Columbia — unclaimed property (Unclaimed Property Act, SBC 1999, c. 48)CA-BCSub-national — CanadaUnclaimed Property Act, SBC 1999, c. 48Confidence: mediumQuébec — biens non réclamés (Loi sur les biens non réclamés, RLRQ c. B-5.1)CA-QCSub-national — CanadaLoi sur les biens non réclamés, RLRQ c. B-5.1Confidence: medium
Card and bank billing1
Unwanted calls1
Data rights2
Canada Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActCANational — CanadaPersonal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C. 2000, c. 5Confidence: mediumQuebec — Law 25 (Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector)CA-QCSub-national — CanadaAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, CQLR c. P-39.1 (as amended by Law 25)Confidence: medium
How to read a confidence grade
- Confidence: highRead off primary law1
- The trigger and the figure both come from the statute, regulation or convention itself, at the pinpoint cited. Quote it. The citation on the regime page is the text a counterparty has to answer.
- Confidence: mediumDerived or secondary source12
- The law is clear but a threshold or an amount is indexed, converted, or taken from an official regulator page rather than the instrument. The entitlement is sound; treat the exact figure as an opening number and check the current rate.
- Confidence: lowUnverified — no amount stated11
- We could not tie the entry to a source we trust: the regime is in flux, or the only accounts of it are law-firm summaries and press. We state that the regime exists and where to look, and we deliberately state no figure. A gap we admit to is worth more than a number nobody checked.
Run your facts against all of them at once.
You do not have to work out which of these applies. Answer once and the engine reconciles every regime that reaches you.