Skip to content
Coverage

Card and bank billing

Fair Credit Billing Act (Regulation Z billing-error resolution and claims-and-defences)

NationalUSRead off primary law

United States (federal)

Rule id
billing.us-fcba
Version
1.0.0
In force from
October 28, 1975
Last read against its sources
August 5, 2026
Countries bound
United States

In plain language

What this regime says.

The Fair Credit Billing Act gives US credit-card holders two separate rights. The billing-error right (Regulation Z § 1026.13) is fast and powerful but expires 60 days after the first statement showing the charge. The claims-and-defences right (§ 1026.12(c)) is narrower — goods and services disputes only, over $50, after you have tried the merchant — but has no deadline at all while the money is unpaid.

Who is covered

Consumers with an open-end credit account (an ordinary credit card) issued in the United States. It does not cover debit cards, prepaid cards drawing on a deposit account, or bank transfers — those fall under Regulation E.

What you get

The disputed charge removed along with any finance charges on it; the right to withhold payment on the disputed amount while the dispute is open; protection from delinquency reporting; a written explanation and the underlying documents; and, if the creditor breaks the procedure, forfeiture of the disputed amount up to $50 plus a civil action under 15 U.S.C. § 1640.

Where claims go wrong

  • Disputing by phone. Only a written notice received at the creditor's billing-inquiries address starts the § 1026.13 clock.
  • Sending the notice to the payment address. § 1026.13(b)(1) requires the address disclosed under § 1026.7(a)(9)/(b)(9).
  • Counting 60 days from the transaction rather than from the first statement that showed it.
  • Paying the disputed amount "to be safe" and losing the leverage § 1026.13(d) gives you.
  • Assuming that missing the 60 days ends everything — for a goods or services dispute, § 1026.12(c) does not expire while the amount is unpaid.
The official claim route

Authority

Every citation,
with its pinpoint.

A claim that cites “EU law” gets filed. A claim that cites Article 7(1)(c) gets answered. These are the exact coordinates this entry rests on.
  1. Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1666Fair Credit Billing Act (Title III of the Consumer Credit Protection Act)15 U.S.C. § 1666
  2. Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13Regulation Z (Truth in Lending), 12 CFR Part 1026URL verified 2026-08-05§ 1026.13 (Billing error resolution)
  3. Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.12(c)Regulation Z (Truth in Lending), 12 CFR Part 1026URL verified 2026-08-05§ 1026.12(c) — right of cardholder to assert claims or defences against the card issuer
  4. 15 U.S.C. § 1666(e)Fair Credit Billing Act§ 1666(e) — a creditor that fails to comply with the billing-error procedure forfeits the disputed amount and any finance charges on it, capped at $50

Sources

Where a figure is indexed, converted or published by a regulator rather than fixed in the instrument, the provenance is recorded separately. Anything marked as a modelled estimate is exactly that — a model, not a statutory number.

What it imposes

Clocks, defences and the ladder.

A rule module builds these while it evaluates, because a limitation period depends on which forum is open to you. What follows is the structure this regime produces — deliberately with no dates and no figures, because those belong to your facts rather than to the law.

The clocks it starts

  • Written billing-error notice to the creditor (60 days)Fatal if missedYour notice must reach the creditor within 60 days of the first periodic statement showing the error, at the billing-inquiries address disclosed on the statement — not the address you send payments to. Missing this deadline ends the billing-error claim.Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13(b)(1) — § 1026.13(b)(1) — notice received no later than 60 days after the creditor transmitted the first periodic statement reflecting the alleged billing errorNotice period
  • Creditor's written acknowledgment (30 days)§ 1026.13(c)(1) requires the creditor to mail or deliver a written acknowledgment within 30 days of receiving your notice, unless it has already resolved the dispute. The clock runs from the date your notice reaches them. (Period: 30 days. We need the start date to work out your exact deadline.)Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13(c) — § 1026.13(c)(1)-(2) — written acknowledgment within 30 days; resolution within 2 complete billing cycles and in no event later than 90 daysResponse due
  • Creditor must resolve (2 billing cycles, never more than 90 days)§ 1026.13(c)(2) requires resolution within two complete billing cycles and in no event later than 90 days after your notice is received. Blowing this deadline has a price: under 15 U.S.C. § 1666(e) the creditor forfeits the disputed amount and any finance charges on it, up to $50. (Period: 90 days. We need the start date to work out your exact deadline.)Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13(c) — § 1026.13(c)(1)-(2) — written acknowledgment within 30 days; resolution within 2 complete billing cycles and in no event later than 90 daysResponse due
  • Civil action under TILA § 130 (1 year)If the creditor breaks the billing-error rules you can sue it under 15 U.S.C. § 1640, but an individual action must be brought within one year of the violation (§ 1640(e)). Missing this does not affect your right to have the charge removed; it removes only the damages action against the creditor.15 U.S.C. § 1640 — § 1640(a) civil liability; § 1640(e) one-year limitation period for an individual actionLimitation period

What it entitles you to, beyond money

  • You may stop paying the disputed amount while the dispute is open§ 1026.13(d)(1): "The consumer need not pay (and the creditor may not try to collect) any portion of any required payment that the consumer believes is related to the disputed amount." Keep paying the undisputed balance — that part is still due, and paying it removes the creditor's only honest argument for a late fee.§ 1026.13(d)(1)-(2) — consumer need not pay the disputed amount, and the creditor may not report it as delinquent, while the dispute is open
  • The creditor may not report the disputed amount as delinquent§ 1026.13(d)(2) forbids the creditor from reporting the disputed amount as delinquent to a credit bureau, or from threatening to, until the dispute is settled or judgment is entered. If it has already done so, that is a separate violation worth raising in the same letter.§ 1026.13(d)(1)-(2) — consumer need not pay the disputed amount, and the creditor may not report it as delinquent, while the dispute is open
  • The creditor must acknowledge in 30 days and resolve within two billing cycles§ 1026.13(c). If it misses those deadlines, 15 U.S.C. § 1666(e) makes it forfeit the disputed amount and any finance charges on it, capped at $50 — small money, but a clean, citable consequence that concentrates minds.§ 1026.13(c)(1)-(2) — written acknowledgment within 30 days; resolution within 2 complete billing cycles and in no event later than 90 days
  • You can demand the documents the creditor relied onIf the creditor concludes there was no billing error, § 1026.13(f) requires a written explanation, and § 1026.13(g)(4) entitles you to copies of the documentary evidence on request. Ask for it in the same breath as you dispute — a creditor that cannot produce a signed receipt or a delivery confirmation has usually not conducted the reasonable investigation the rule requires.§ 1026.13(f) — procedures if a billing error did not occur as asserted; § 1026.13(g)(4) documentary evidence on request

What the other side will say

Each of these is a refusal this regime lets a counterparty attempt, paired with the answer to it. Reading them before you write is worth more than any amount of polish on the letter itself.

"You have to take it up with the merchant first"

high likelihood

The issuer tells you to resolve it with the retailer and refuses to open a dispute until you have.

What answers it

§ 1026.13 imposes no such precondition. A billing-error notice triggers the creditor's obligations on its own terms; contacting the merchant is a condition only of the separate claims-and-defences right in § 1026.12(c)(3)(i). Say which right you are asserting and cite the section.

Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13 — § 1026.13 (Billing error resolution)

"You are outside the 60 days"

high likelihood

The issuer counts 60 days from the transaction date and refuses the dispute as late.

What answers it

§ 1026.13(b)(1) runs the 60 days from the date the creditor transmitted the first periodic statement that reflects the alleged billing error — not the transaction date, and not the date you noticed. Where the creditor failed to send a statement to your last known address at all, that failure is itself a billing error under § 1026.13(a)(7). And for a goods or services dispute, § 1026.12(c) has no 60-day limit while the amount is unpaid.

Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13(b)(1) — § 1026.13(b)(1) — notice received no later than 60 days after the creditor transmitted the first periodic statement reflecting the alleged billing error

"You still have to pay while we investigate"

high likelihood

The issuer bills the disputed amount, adds a late fee, or threatens to report you.

What answers it

§ 1026.13(d)(1) says in terms that the consumer need not pay, and the creditor may not try to collect, any part of a required payment related to the disputed amount; § 1026.13(d)(2) forbids reporting it as delinquent. Quote both and ask for the fee to be reversed.

Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13(d) — § 1026.13(d)(1)-(2) — consumer need not pay the disputed amount, and the creditor may not report it as delinquent, while the dispute is open

"The merchant provided evidence, so we are closing the dispute"

high likelihood

The issuer closes the file on the strength of a shipping number or a signed terms-of-sale page.

What answers it

§ 1026.13(f) requires the creditor to conduct a reasonable investigation before concluding no error occurred, and § 1026.13(g)(4) entitles you to the documentary evidence it relied on. Ask for it. A tracking number that shows delivery to a different address, or an unsigned invoice, is not evidence that the goods were "accepted by the consumer" within § 1026.13(a)(3).

Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.13(f) — § 1026.13(f) — procedures if a billing error did not occur as asserted; § 1026.13(g)(4) documentary evidence on request

"The merchant is out of state, so § 1026.12(c) does not apply"

medium likelihood

The issuer invokes the same-state-or-100-miles limitation to refuse a claims-and-defences assertion.

What answers it

§ 1026.12(c)(3)(ii) disapplies the limitation where the issuer and merchant are the same person, are commonly controlled, where the merchant is a franchised dealer in the issuer's products or services, or where the issuer made or participated in the solicitation. Beyond that, every major US issuer publicly waives the limitation; ask them to confirm their waiver policy in writing, and note that a refusal to do so is a good line in a CFPB complaint.

Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 1026.12(c)(3) — § 1026.12(c)(3)(i)-(ii) — the $50 and same-state-or-100-miles limitations, and the cases in which they do not apply

"We can only go by the card network rules"

medium likelihood

The issuer treats the matter purely as a Visa or Mastercard chargeback and says the network declined it.

What answers it

Network rules are a private contract between the issuer and the scheme. They do not displace the Fair Credit Billing Act, and a failed chargeback does not discharge the creditor's independent obligations under § 1026.13 or § 1026.12(c). Say that you are asserting a statutory right, not requesting a chargeback, and that a refusal will go to the CFPB.

Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1666 — 15 U.S.C. § 1666

Where to take it next

  1. Written billing-error notice to the creditorSend it to the billing-inquiries address printed on your statement — § 1026.13(b)(1) requires the notice to be received at the address disclosed under § 1026.7(a)(9)/(b)(9). Notices sent to the payment address, or made by phone, do not start the statutory clock. Send it so you can prove delivery, state the account number, the dollar amount and why you believe it is wrong, and keep a copy.Claim directtypically 30 days
  2. Demand the documentary evidence and escalate internallyIf the creditor says no error occurred, request the documents under § 1026.13(g)(4) and put your rebuttal in writing within 10 days of their explanation. Doing so obliges the creditor, if it then reports the amount as delinquent, to disclose that the amount is disputed and to give the name and address of anyone it reported to (§ 1026.13(g)(3)).Internal appealtypically 30 days
  3. Complaint to the Consumer Financial Protection BureauThe CFPB routes the complaint to the issuer and requires a substantive response, usually within 15 days. It is free, takes about fifteen minutes, and creates a supervised paper trail that materially changes how a large issuer handles a file.Regulatortypically 60 daysofficial page
  4. State attorney general and prudential regulatorYour state attorney general takes consumer complaints against card issuers, and national banks answer to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (helpwithmybank.gov). Running these in parallel with the CFPB costs nothing.Regulatortypically 90 daysofficial page
  5. Small-claims action under TILA § 130A creditor that fails to follow § 1026.13 is civilly liable under 15 U.S.C. § 1640 for actual damages, statutory damages, costs and a reasonable attorney's fee. An individual action must be filed within one year of the violation. Small-claims courts handle these without a lawyer; filing fees are typically USD 30-100 and often recoverable.Small claimstypically 120 days

Documents

What this regime can produce.

Every one of these is a document you send yourself, in your own name. Duesday never writes to anybody on your behalf and is never anyone’s agent.

The same claim type elsewhere

Card scheme chargeback rules (Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover)SCHEMESupranationalparty states varyVisa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service RulesConfidence: mediumPSD2 — unauthorised transactions and direct-debit refunds (Directive (EU) 2015/2366)EUSupranational30 countriesDirective (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)Confidence: highNorway — Financial Contracts Act 2020 and FinansklagenemndaNONationalNorwayLov om finansavtaler (finansavtaleloven), LOV-2020-12-18-146Confidence: mediumRussia — Federal Law 161-FZ on the National Payment System and the financial ombudsmanRUNationalRussiaФедеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», ст. 9Confidence: mediumSwitzerland — Financial Services Act ombudsman affiliation and the Swiss Banking OmbudsmanCHNationalSwitzerlandFinancial Services Act (FinSA / FIDLEG), SR 950.1Confidence: mediumTürkiye — Bank Cards and Credit Cards Law No. 5464 and the Consumer Arbitration CommitteesTRNationalTürkiyeBanka Kartları ve Kredi Kartları Kanunu No. 5464Confidence: mediumConsumer Credit Act 1974 s.75 (and s.75A) — creditor joint and several liabilityGBNationalUnited KingdomConsumer Credit Act 1974, s.75Confidence: highCanada — payment card codes of conduct, provincial consumer protection and OBSICANationalCanadaCode of Conduct for the Payment Card Industry in CanadaConfidence: medium

Other rights in the same countries

Does this one reach your facts?

The engine runs every regime that could apply at once and reconciles them, rather than making you guess which page to read.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. You send it yourself. This page describes a law; it is not advice about your situation and no outcome is promised.